Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*apparently false scores leaked* STROUD SCORES 18% ON S2 TEST (or maybe not)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

If it genuinely comes from Bob McGinn, I'd say it's true.

We'll see if there are any responses to it, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

The guy can play good football and that test does not prove anything. If he don't get drafted till later rounds that is a failure other teams have to deal with missing out on a proven player they could have had and passed over.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

The score does line up a little with the film and what some of the PFF guys really have been hammering about him under pressure.
Pressure situations=needs faster reaction and read times.  Which the scores evaluate.  And that’s something Stroud was pretty bad at.

 

I wouldn’t take him off the board as a top 10 team at all.  Because he has a bunch of other good traits to be a franchise guy.  

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

No 

Just that he didn’t handle pressure well. And when needed to react fast.  This is what that test shows.

When he had a clean pocket.  He was fantastic.  But this really has nothing to do with that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

The main twitter guy just writes for fantasy football, but he was summarizing a Bob McGinn article thats behind a paywall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

I live and breathe football and I have never heard of a site called Golong or mcginn draft.  Doesnt mean he isnt credible but its a pretty rando site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is huge may not be a trap game but this plays a major part in what they want to do. If we can get some pressure on Sam we know what he does with pressure coming hit and heavy. Also we may be able to take the top off their defense a backup safety trying to stop TMac or Cooker over the top or forcing him to play the backend should allow us to run the ball somewhat effectively. Either they allow some runs or we take some shots and if Bryce and whoever can connect deep we’ll be in business for another big time win against a top notch opponent. Might not be a trap game but health travel game plans all play a major role in each weeks game plan and this week might be leaving our way. We’re missing some replaceable pieces they’re missing key anchors to the offense and defense major difference time to solidly ourselves at one of the top teams in the nfc tomorrow fellas buckle up.
    • Yes.  If I am not mistaken, we need to sign Coker to the ERFA tender and insist that XL spends his spring and summer at a WR camp and not Coon huntin on his four wheeler.  XL was raw when we picked him--which is why I wanted to go another direction--and we are seeing how raw.  He is basically learning a position.     The Panthers will make their move in 2026 to be an NFL powerhouse behind Bryce.  Bryce needs intelligent WRs who catch the ball.  That said, we need a solid #2 to challenge XL and make cutting him easy, if necessary.  A #2 WR (intented to be a #1 by now) with under 400 yards is embarrassing.   On offense, you have to ask, "Where can we get better?"  In my view, #2 WR, TE (although they are improving) and maybe C (again, if we re-sign Mays, he is trending up and at 26, entering his prime--I say stay with him and find competition later in the draft (not good for C).  OL depth maybe?  In other words, XL is a glaring weak spot.    
×
×
  • Create New...