Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*apparently false scores leaked* STROUD SCORES 18% ON S2 TEST (or maybe not)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

If it genuinely comes from Bob McGinn, I'd say it's true.

We'll see if there are any responses to it, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

The guy can play good football and that test does not prove anything. If he don't get drafted till later rounds that is a failure other teams have to deal with missing out on a proven player they could have had and passed over.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

The score does line up a little with the film and what some of the PFF guys really have been hammering about him under pressure.
Pressure situations=needs faster reaction and read times.  Which the scores evaluate.  And that’s something Stroud was pretty bad at.

 

I wouldn’t take him off the board as a top 10 team at all.  Because he has a bunch of other good traits to be a franchise guy.  

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

No 

Just that he didn’t handle pressure well. And when needed to react fast.  This is what that test shows.

When he had a clean pocket.  He was fantastic.  But this really has nothing to do with that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

The main twitter guy just writes for fantasy football, but he was summarizing a Bob McGinn article thats behind a paywall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

I live and breathe football and I have never heard of a site called Golong or mcginn draft.  Doesnt mean he isnt credible but its a pretty rando site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...