Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*apparently false scores leaked* STROUD SCORES 18% ON S2 TEST (or maybe not)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

If it genuinely comes from Bob McGinn, I'd say it's true.

We'll see if there are any responses to it, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

The guy can play good football and that test does not prove anything. If he don't get drafted till later rounds that is a failure other teams have to deal with missing out on a proven player they could have had and passed over.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

The score does line up a little with the film and what some of the PFF guys really have been hammering about him under pressure.
Pressure situations=needs faster reaction and read times.  Which the scores evaluate.  And that’s something Stroud was pretty bad at.

 

I wouldn’t take him off the board as a top 10 team at all.  Because he has a bunch of other good traits to be a franchise guy.  

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

No 

Just that he didn’t handle pressure well. And when needed to react fast.  This is what that test shows.

When he had a clean pocket.  He was fantastic.  But this really has nothing to do with that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

The main twitter guy just writes for fantasy football, but he was summarizing a Bob McGinn article thats behind a paywall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

I live and breathe football and I have never heard of a site called Golong or mcginn draft.  Doesnt mean he isnt credible but its a pretty rando site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...