Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*apparently false scores leaked* STROUD SCORES 18% ON S2 TEST (or maybe not)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

If it genuinely comes from Bob McGinn, I'd say it's true.

We'll see if there are any responses to it, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Wait, we’re just accepting this is true with no questions whatsoever despite contradicting multiple reports from the past couple months?  If it’s true, then that’s a negative mark but hardly a death knell. 

The guy can play good football and that test does not prove anything. If he don't get drafted till later rounds that is a failure other teams have to deal with missing out on a proven player they could have had and passed over.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

The score does line up a little with the film and what some of the PFF guys really have been hammering about him under pressure.
Pressure situations=needs faster reaction and read times.  Which the scores evaluate.  And that’s something Stroud was pretty bad at.

 

I wouldn’t take him off the board as a top 10 team at all.  Because he has a bunch of other good traits to be a franchise guy.  

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If it leaks from more then one person I would probably give it a bit more credence to the report but its on some rando article for now

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Hmmm... Guess if the film lines up with the score. So your saying had he scored a 95 he would have thrown for 23, 654 with 98 tds. Seems legit if so.

No 

Just that he didn’t handle pressure well. And when needed to react fast.  This is what that test shows.

When he had a clean pocket.  He was fantastic.  But this really has nothing to do with that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The main Twitter source is nobody I've heard of but the guy he's floating (Bob McGinn) is a very legit source.

the one seen quoting it (John Crumpler) is also valid.

The main twitter guy just writes for fantasy football, but he was summarizing a Bob McGinn article thats behind a paywall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The one thing I would say is that Bob McGinn isn't typically someone I would expect to leak information like this.

And yeah, it is a test. Not the same as live football...

I live and breathe football and I have never heard of a site called Golong or mcginn draft.  Doesnt mean he isnt credible but its a pretty rando site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...