Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Say..the S2 scores that were leaked aren't accurate


Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

It would be pretty easy info for the top teams in the draft to find out so I don’t really buy other teams leaking he had a bad score. But all reports coming out now is Stroud is gonna slip in the draft there has to be a reason 

As he said in this interview, once the scores came out he had a bunch of GMs call him. 
 

Every year a guy starts to slip and more often than not it turns out he shouldn’t have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Varking said:

He said that player was at an all star game. That wasn’t CJ. Reaching. 

They can't hear/see anything beyond his cute little face. HE could be the low score, their heads would explode because it's all they've got...

He's smart enough to conquer football without the physical side. Silly.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Evil Hurney said:

I don't understand this part. I thought all the teams had access to the scores. Why would they care if the "wrong" scores got out?

I think only about half the teams in the NFL pay for access to the S2 test. It is this guy’s worst nightmare for his test to tank the stock of a top prospect before he has full buy in from every team. Once he has full buy in, no college QB would dare decline the test. But until he has that, he doesn’t want the college QBs to start seeing reasons not to take it. He is an extremely biased source giving extremely vague information.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mwright350 said:

These scores are such an odd thing to fixate on.  

Agreed, I am so tired of hearing about them. Obviously Stroud's score hurt him which is a shame as his game tape tells another story and his arm delivers a very nice accurate pass which is something all QB's should be able to do in order to be taken seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

The "context" story is most likely about Hendon Hooker (possibly Clayton Tune). To my knowledge CJ Stroud (as well as B. Young, W. Levis, A. Richardson) didn't take part in an All-Star game this season.

As far as the 2nd guy? I didn't get enough clues, but probability would suggest Stroud as he would be the biggest outlier on the leaked list ... possibly AR. I doubt any of the 90's scores are the incorrect ones since he made a point to talk about context and re-testing.

The leaked list I assume is being used: 

 

 

I think the other score he is talking about might be Anthony Richardson’s. There had been reports of him scoring in the high 80’s-low 90’s previously. The silence from Stroud’s camp on this is deafening.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We are picking Young.  And when that pick comes in, please start a thread about the new team you are going to root for, because I doubt people want to deal with you every time our QB gets hit or has a turnover over the next decade.  Your obsession with name-calling and Young bashing is borderline.  Perhaps we will understand more when Netflix completes their documentary on you.

 

A vertically challenged individual must have banged his significant other. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...