Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official NFL 2023 Draft Discussion

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Hopefully that will happen. Only thing is wasn't 93 and 145 traded to Steelers. If that is the case we will only have 2 picks left 114 and 132.

Yeah, 114 would have been our first pick tmrw anyway. I feel like it's gotta be CB and OL in whichever order. Then we also need about 20 UDFA's so that will be exciting. Maybe 1 or 2 vet signings but the majority of those spots will be UDFA underdogs

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherOnTheProwl1523 Mentor

PantherOnTheProwl1523

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah, 114 would have been our first pick tmrw anyway. I feel like it's gotta be CB and OL in whichever order. Then we also need about 20 UDFA's so that will be exciting. Maybe 1 or 2 vet signings but the majority of those spots will be UDFA underdogs

Hopefully Trice, Ringo, or other decent players are left. My daughter is a GA Bulldog fan and she said Ringo is the one that intercepted Bryce Young in that national title game game which ended with GA winning that game. She said wouldn't it be convenient to draft the guy that stole the game from Young end up one of  Youngs weapons.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...