Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking ahead (staff speculation)


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Chudzinski got the Browns HC gig after we went 7-9. We went a combined 13-19 in his two seasons.

The team doesn't have to be good for a coordinator to get plucked, just his unit.

I hear you. Not saying we make the championship round or anything, but it would mean our young defense feasted or Young excelled his rookie year. Both positives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Unless we make the nfc championship game at minimum this season I do not think we will have to worry about losing staff.  Until we actually win something its not a problem.  With Teppers approach at filling coaching staff I do not think we will have trouble filling the positions even if we do get poached. 

If we make the playoffs someone is getting hired away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

We won't lose Thomas Brown unless Bryce is a stud in Year 1 and, if that's the case, we'll have a plethora of OCs to choose from moving forward. Similar situation setting up with our young core on defense too.

Brown's had head coaching interviews already.

He was considered a hot head coaching candidate prior to joining us, in part because of the Sean McVay connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Starting to wonder just how much longer Bill is going to be up in New England?

Were I in his shoes, retirement would have been pretty high on my "to do list" after the last couple seasons.

Definitely.  There was a lot of speculation in New England, almost an expectation, that he would retire a couple of years ago. 

I thought maybe he was grooming McDaniels to be his successor.  Either McDaniels got impatient (bad move on his part given his shortcomings), Hoodie rethought that, or he has no definite plan on when he will step aside.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Definitely.  There was a lot of speculation in New England, almost an expectation, that he would retire a couple of years ago. 

I thought maybe he was grooming McDaniels to be his successor.  Either McDaniels got impatient (bad move on his part given his shortcomings), Hoodie rethought that, or he has no definite plan on when he will step aside.  

Tea leaves certainly looked that way to me...maybe Kraft asked him to stay after Brady left to boost team value?  He's up there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2023 at 3:44 PM, PantherKyle said:

If we lose a coordinator to a HC role, it would mean good things for our 2023 season. 

When and if we lose coordinators to other teams I hope we have coaches on the staff that are capable of moving into those roles. I think that would be important for our young players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've only ever considered it possible for 1, maybe 2 if pinned inside the 10, deep balls per drive. The play is just too big. A new deep ball can be completed in under 2.5 seconds. That just isn't right. 
    • It’s out there to look up. There is a definition. It is so convoluted and broad I got frustrated before I could finish it.  It just seemed wrong to me.  I think the words they choose for the names of these stats are the bigger problem than the stat itself. Because there were things in that definition that I thought to myself “how is that big time?”
    • yes. I never paid much attention to these stats until people started using them to tell me how great Bryce is.  When I have watched every snap he ever took and look at video during the week, and can objectively see how ‘great’ he is, what his throws look like, the whole thing. The stats criteria is just misleading to faulty when you look at it. That doesn’t reflect on Bryce, I can’t see how it does. It is directed at the criteria being used to evaluate him. And others.     No joke, the game casts now call a 16 yard TD a deep pass - I can only surmise it is because it went 4 yards deep in the end zone making it a 20 yard throw. Who among us, all being likely lifelong football fans, grew up picturing a 16 yard TD pass as a deep ball? Anybody?  It is just not a helpful stat, it is absurd. There is no stat for 30 yard throws. Nor for 40. And so on. And they are generally more demanding throws. Say your QB nailed 4 35 yard throws in a game and my QB nailed 4 20s. Should they be rated equally as deep passers off of that? Tell me my guy is has the best rate on 20-30 yard throws instead. Break it down.  To call 20 yards and everything past that the same thing? Why would you do that? I mean, calling a 20 yard pass a deep ball, is like calling Bryce tall.     
×
×
  • Create New...