Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN ranked all 32 NFL teams by rosters, here's their list from best to worst:

ladypanther

By ladypanther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

who did this list?

With the NFL in a quiet period between post-draft minicamps and preseason training camps, it's time to reassess how all 32 teams built -- and maintained -- their rosters this offseason. Which franchises retained their high-end talent from last season, added impact contributors in free agency and found potential starters in April's draft? And on the flip side, which teams actually are in worse shape than in 2022?

We asked ESPN football analysts Mike Clay and Seth Walder to rank NFL rosters from 1 to 32, then combined rankings to come up with our list of the league's best -- and worst. We asked them to rate each roster based on the talent, age and production of the players, not taking into account how some coaching staffs can squeeze the best out of their talent. Clay's rankings are powered by his 2023 projections, which include detailed stats and score predictions for every team.

Clay detailed the strongest and weakest units for all 32 squads, while Walder picked X factors to watch and nonstarters to know across the league. The projected starting lineups below are via Clay's projections. Here's how each roster stacks up:


ESPN +
Continue reading this article and more from top writers, for only $9.99/mo.

Continue Reading
Already an ESPN+ subscriber? Log in here.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/37892244/2023-season-roster-rankings-starting-lineups-all-32-nfl-teams

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

These rankings are pretty pointless. We already established the media doesn't respect us so why should we care about where they rank us?

Well...it is amusing to me.  Also gives the team an extra motivator....seems like a chip on the shoulder is a good thing.  Should have a bulletin board full.  

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

With the NFL in a quiet period between post-draft minicamps and preseason training camps, it's time to reassess how all 32 teams built -- and maintained -- their rosters this offseason. Which franchises retained their high-end talent from last season, added impact contributors in free agency and found potential starters in April's draft? And on the flip side, which teams actually are in worse shape than in 2022?

We asked ESPN football analysts Mike Clay and Seth Walder to rank NFL rosters from 1 to 32, then combined rankings to come up with our list of the league's best -- and worst. We asked them to rate each roster based on the talent, age and production of the players, not taking into account how some coaching staffs can squeeze the best out of their talent. Clay's rankings are powered by his 2023 projections, which include detailed stats and score predictions for every team.

Clay detailed the strongest and weakest units for all 32 squads, while Walder picked X factors to watch and nonstarters to know across the league. The projected starting lineups below are via Clay's projections. Here's how each roster stacks up:


ESPN +
Continue reading this article and more from top writers, for only $9.99/mo.

Continue Reading
Already an ESPN+ subscriber? Log in here.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/37892244/2023-season-roster-rankings-starting-lineups-all-32-nfl-teams

Took the average of TWO whole lists lol. Really groundbreaking stuff. I guess maybe that’s all they had left after the layoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frizzy350 Apprentice

Frizzy350

Posted
Posted

The 49ers ranking alone should tell you everything you need to know about this list.
Thats a top 5 roster no question.

Chiefs #1 is way too high for their roster as whole - Mahomes and Reid add a lot to their success. Still a good roster but probably not the top spot.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      2027 superbowl odds

      By strato · Posted

      Lol Atlanta looks to have lost their young edge rusher, has no 1st round pick, a complete mess at QB, a new coaching staff… And we swept them this year. Says what they think of us. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      PFF Best Deep Ball Thrower Award

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I mean, you can only go so far with the propping up. When a guy's numbers are as bad overall as Bryce's you have to try to find specific niches to sell. It's just funny that they're honing in on where he's probably weakest to try to prop him up. Whether it's a pro-Bryce conspiracy or not, it echos my chief complaint about PFF's analysis for years. When your purely statistical analysis badly skews from the eye test of actually watching the games, it should be screaming at you that you need to modify your system not double down on it. PFF is awesome at compiling stats but their grade systems are highly flawed and they never seem to try to improve them.
    • ForJimmy
      PFF Best Deep Ball Thrower Award

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Then why is Byce also last in other PFF stats?  The deep ball thrower stat by PFF can simply be flawed vs some conspiracy trying to prop up a QB on a team that a former employee now works for.  Both of these guys were also hired AFTER the Panthers had already drafted Bryce.  Trying to prop him up with a made up stat while he struggled would be a detriment to their own team honestly.  
×
×
  • Create New...