Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pssssst.......


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Every season is new.  That win total from last year is meaningless.   Those teams don’t exist anymore.  We got to 7 with an abnormal amount of games against the worst run defenses in the NFL playing like it was 1963.   

the QB isnt just logged as an upgrade over bad vets.   He is a rookie.  It’s its own thing.  Lot to learn and see.  Great rookie prospects have a really rough time learning those lumps.  Learning to win is hard.  And he has an entire cast learning a new scheme while he does. 

And the roster around the QB week 1 on offense isn’t better than what we have put out there the last couple years.   

People talk as though it's just one continuous season, and like the schedule is a carbon copy, and like all the other teams are just standing still. 

I know damn well that the Saints are farther along on the curve to legitimacy than we are this season by virtue of their talent and experience alone, not to mention their staff and coaching continuity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

People talk as though it's just one continuous season, and like the schedule is a carbon copy, and like all the other teams are just standing still. 

I know damn well that the Saints are farther along on the curve to legitimacy than we are this season by virtue of their talent and experience alone, not to mention their staff and coaching continuity. 

Well....Allen has never had a winning season and they have mostly new defensive coaches. Other than their long time OC there isn't much if anything to their coaching continuity.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Martin said:

Yeah I don’t think people are very fond of condescending “I know better than you” type posts in general.

Especially when ex pro running backs come out and say “relax it’s just preseason “ you can be concerned but over reactionary and dismissive of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Every season is new.  That win total from last year is meaningless.   Those teams don’t exist anymore.  We got to 7 with an abnormal amount of games against the worst run defenses in the NFL playing like it was 1963.   

the QB isnt just logged as an upgrade over bad vets.   He is a rookie.  It’s its own thing.  Lot to learn and see.  Great rookie prospects have a really rough time learning those lumps.  Learning to win is hard.  And he has an entire cast learning a new scheme while he does. 

And the roster around the QB week 1 on offense isn’t better than what we have put out there the last couple years.   

Not to mention that 6, possibly 7, of the 11 starters on offense are new. Only 1 of those are on the oline. None of them have played together before and all of them are learning a new system.  And they all are lead by a rookie qb. 

On defense there are 5 new starters. That's 5 of 11 new players on defense that is learning a new scheme that most of them have never played before.  

So yeah, that doesn't sound good for us. Not this season. But we can reck some playoff hopefuls dreams while they get their feet under them.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Zod said:

You don't seem to understand what happened this off-season.

 

It isn't a retooling.

 

They wiped the board completely clean and are starting over. It is not a continuation. 

 

Looking at last year's record is completely meaningless.

Interesting 

because our very own dam GM was quiet contrary to what you just said.

 

”We built the Defense, then the OL.  We’ve built up to where we can just drop in a QB”

 

not only A QB

”the most NFL ready QB”

 

Those weren’t yours, mine, or any huddler words.

Those were Carolina Panthers General Manger Scott Fitterer’s words.

 

It amazes me after all the bashing of Matt Fool and his multi year rebuild plan.  And then praise and point how the NFL you can turn it it around (pointing to Dabol)

Some of us revert right back to “several years down the line rebuild” expectations like that clown that just got fired had.

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CRA said:

But we never did that.  We just hired better than Rhule’s staff.  

our OC and DC combined have 1 year worth of experience in the job.   That’s potential.  That’s unknown. 

Frank got fired for bland and pedestrian offense.  He is Ron Rivera.  He is Jon Fox. 

and the icing on the coach cake was hiring a couple was hiring some 70 year olds to advise us in the 2023 era. Capers and Caldwell aren’t all stars in 2023.   Heck they weren’t decades ago. 

this staff was about bringing some stability and respect to a franchise that became a literal laughing stock because of Rhule.  Which it did.  Frank, Caldwell, Capers.  Respect across the league.  And they got some young coordinators they hope the groom up and see grow.  But they got grow just like Bryce.  

According to the media we did. It felt like after every hire that got tweeted, you had once analyst after the other tweeting that we are bullying something special with this great staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burying the team after 2 preseason games is just as bad as predicting a super bowl.  I still stand by that this roster is between 7-10 and 10-7.  THAT is not based on last year, THAT is based on talent on the roster.  Moton got paid like a very good tackle, Icky was a top LT pick and should be growing into becoming elite.  Jaycee Horn should be growing, Brian burns, Derek brown.  Theres too many names to mention.  Fact is this is a playoff level roster, but theres 1 catch and its not Bryce young.  How healthy can we stay, its that simple, its always that simple and it always will be that simple.  Teams that stay healthy in our talent level position make the playoffs, you see it literally every single season, but if we have even a few key injuries, the season is tanked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Zod said:

You don't seem to understand what happened this off-season.

 

It isn't a retooling.

 

They wiped the board completely clean and are starting over. It is not a continuation. 

 

Looking at last year's record is completely meaningless.

As Scot said. Factory reset with an upgraded processer. 

 

You can't say last year is meaningless when every analyst, pundit, and coach looks at last years team to give an opinion. LOL. What is this amateur hour? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CRA said:

Every season is new.  That win total from last year is meaningless.   Those teams don’t exist anymore.  We got to 7 with an abnormal amount of games against the worst run defenses in the NFL playing like it was 1963.   

the QB isnt just logged as an upgrade over bad vets.   He is a rookie.  It’s its own thing.  Lot to learn and see.  Great rookie prospects have a really rough time learning those lumps.  Learning to win is hard.  And he has an entire cast learning a new scheme while he does. 

And the roster around the QB week 1 on offense isn’t better than what we have put out there the last couple years.   

200.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ncfan said:

Interesting 

because our very own dam GM was quiet contrary to what you just said.

 

”We built the Defense, then the OL.  We’ve built up to where we can just drop in a QB”

 

not only A QB

”the most NFL ready QB”

 

Those weren’t yours, mine, or any huddler words.

Those were Carolina Panthers General Manger Scott Fitterer’s words.

 

It amazes me after all the bashing of Matt Fool and his multi year rebuild plan.  And then praise and point how the NFL you can turn it it around (pointing to Dabol)

Some of us revert right back to “several years down the line rebuild” expectations like that clown that just got fired had.

The giants where 9-7-1. A hair over 500. That's the type of season we can expect IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ncfan said:

Interesting 

because our very own dam GM was quiet contrary to what you just said.

”We built the Defense, then the OL.  We’ve built up to where we can just drop in a QB”

not only A QB

”the most NFL ready QB”

Those weren’t yours, mine, or any huddler words.

Those were Carolina Panthers General Manger Scott Fitterer’s words.

It amazes me after all the bashing of Matt Fool and his multi year rebuild plan.  And then praise and point how the NFL you can turn it it around (pointing to Dabol)

Some of us revert right back to “several years down the line rebuild” expectations like that clown that just got fired had.

What Fitterer described was the roster building process.

The process of implementing a system is separate...and generally takes time.

And while the Giants one year turnaround looks great so far, what happens this year? Are they consistent or do they fall back to earth?

Nothing is guaranteed.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another year of non playoff football would be another dreadful year. This team has great talent. We didn’t pick 1 becasue we were the worst team. We almost made the playoffs last year.  It’s absolutely an expectation to see them win the division with our talent. Too bad it seems either coaching/Playcalling/oline is not up to it so far. 
 

they look bad right now.  Yes. Let’s see how they do week 1 when all the players are playing and we have an actual game plan. If we look like dog poo again week 1, that’s when it’s time to worry. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Drafting a WR in the 1st only guarantees one of T-Mac, Coker, or the new draft pick has zero chance of still being on the roster 4 years from now because they can’t all be paid at the same time. Which is why a WR in the 1st makes no sense, if we do that, I’d be pissed if we don’t also trade Coker this offseason, and I have zero interest in trading him, so……… We know T-Mac is that dude, so unless the team has serious concerns about Coker taking the next step, WR makes so sense to me in the 1st
    • We read each other and we bring together influences from a variety of sources--that is what makes this time of year great.  However, when you realize that the Panthers have talked to three (3) WRs expected to be there around #19, it must give us pause. We all knew about Cooper (who has been heavily mocked to the Jets at #16) and Concepcion (deemed to be the perfect Z WR based on his skill set).  Then the other day, the Panthers quietly brought in another tall WR that seems to be less than a good fit at first glance. First, a glance at the top 2 WRs the Panthers have shown interest in: Cooper (projected to Jets at 16--could possibly go as early as 9) Concepcion (considered to be a perfect fit for the Z WR (leaving Coker in the slot and TMac at X) has one major issue that has plagued the Panthers (see Legette, Xavier, TMac) in the area of drops.  Coker, on the other hand has never dropped anything in his entire life--including "in" or "by."  He can't even eavesdrop.   So, does that stat about Concepcion bother them?  It does me.  XL dropped 14% of his catchable balls as a rookie.  Last year, he found new ways to screw up, such as not knowing the boundares or lateralling to Rico for a big loss.  Yes, TMac was ROY and was terrific, but he had 8 drops, catching just under 60% of targets. Top NFL WRs are in the 70%-80% range--which is good news--it means that TMac can improve.  He caught 70 passes and dropped 8, meaning that his drop rate was about 10%.  If you are counting, Denzel Boston is another first-round WR whose stock may have dropped a bit because he did not run a 40 during his pro day.  However, I see him as the #3 or #4 WR in this draft.     Most people feel that Denzel Boston is in the TMac mold--a tall X.  Many of the same criticisms (about separation and speed) face Boston now. Although he is primarily viewed as a physical X (split end) receiver due to his 6'4", 212-pound frame, Boston has a weakness that makes him less valuable as the X but more valuable as a Z. Boston's ability to get off a jam at the LOS has been questioned--something an X does nearly every play. While his size and contested-catch ability make him a prototypical X, scouts and analysts note he has the versatility to move across the formation, including taking snaps in the Z or as a big slot, often helping to create mismatches. This would make him interchangeable with Coker.  Even if Legette does not come around, the Panthers would have a three-headed hydra at WR.  For much of last season, the Panthers had TMac, a goofy XL, and Versatility: Beyond being an X receiver, he is considered capable of playing Z or in the slot, allowing for movement across the formation. Physicality: With his size and strength, he can play on the outside, making him a strong red-zone target. Role Projection: While he primarily played on the boundary, his profile fits as a versatile receiver who can align in multiple spots to exploit matchups.  His 6-foot-4 height and 209-pound weight are ideal for an outside receiver who can play both X and Z positions at the next level.   NFL Combine write-up:  Two-year starter with elite ball skills that should supersede athletic/speed limitations. A Puka Nacua comparison might feel strong, but like Nacua, Boston enters the draft with speed/separation concerns and outstanding competitive toughness. Boston gets off the line with good burst and maintains his top speed throughout the route. He could have issues beating press, but releases can also be schemed. He’s very skilled when it comes to winning jump balls and contested throws. Boston also knows how to win in the red zone. Acclimating to NFL competition could take a year, but Boston has the makeup to become a productive possession target with above-average red-zone value.   The Panthers have looked at three Z WRs who will be first-rounders in all likelihood.  They have a proven track record of bringing in first-round picks.  The tea leaves are strong in this case.   here is Greg Cosell talking to the Bills analysts.  What he says about Boston (compares to TMac) is interesting (4:45).  https://www.buffalobills.com/video/greg-cosell-breaks-down-wr-draft-class-buffalo-bills Screen Shot:  No share available. "I don't think you have to just line him up inside (slot).  I think you can play him outside (X)."  That comment suggests he can play X, slot, or Z.  He then compares KC Concepcion vs. Boston--very different WRs.  In my view, Boston is more versatile.  Boston has excellent hands and he wins contested balls.  Red Zone--giving TMac someone on the other side of the field with the sure-handed Coker inside.  What Cosell says later (about Hurst, actually, but it applies to Concepcion): "You can teach guys to catch a ball."   He talks about Concepcion, Boston, and Cooper in succession.  I get the feeling he is less impressed with Cooper than others are because he questions the competition--based on the Indiana system vs. zone etc.  I would also say that any WR who has a good WR on the other side of the field probably gets less defensive attention. I should add that this also reflects poorly on XL, but I have said he would be a late bloomer.  I had no idea how much he did not know about football.  We shall see, but can you imaging how potent we'd be in 4 WR sets if he comes around?  How do you cover that?  (OT people are biting their lips right now) THE DRAFT It sure looks as though the Panthers are looking seriously at WR (the Z spot specifically) in the draft.  Can you see any other position that has garnered this much attention for potential day 1 players?  I cannot.   I am concerned about the OT situation, don't get me wrong, but Morgan is going to think, "I have a starter and I brought in a swing T (Forsythe).  Moton is a real concern.  We may look at RT later--and I know how others feel about it.  We could re-sign BC and he would be available after a month or two....I dunno. Less than 2 weeks to go--just thought I would take a look at WR because it seems, based on available "evidence," that a WR will be our pick....again.  
×
×
  • Create New...