Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots releasing Corral

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

2 weeks ago when the Pats picked up Corral a lot of you used that against Fitt. Now that the Pats have waived Corral, a lot of you are holding that against Fitt. Just shows that consistency is not a big Huddle trait. And if you want to disparage someone, spin is more important than facts. 

 

Damm, this interwebz thingy is more fun than a barrel of monkeys. 

 

for someone who hates this place you sure are here a lot

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

for someone who hates this place you sure are here a lot

 

I'm not sure you have the reading part down. But I am sure you need help with the comprehension part.

 

Cuz I LOVE this place. Just reading through the threads puts a big smile on my face. And I have you to thank for most of it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

QB is a tough position to evaluate for scouts. I’m glad my job doesn’t depend on it. Corral’s accuracy looked terrible last game, but in college it was his strength. It’s mind boggling, but I think we have a good one now in Young so hopefully this whole Corral thing will become water under the bridge. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

QB is a tough position to evaluate for scouts. I’m glad my job doesn’t depend on it. Corral’s accuracy looked terrible last game, but in college it was his strength. It’s mind boggling, but I think we have a good one now in Young so hopefully this whole Corral thing will become water under the bridge. 

 

Can you think of the last running team that did anything? Titans, but they had Tannyhill. Ridder ain't no Tannyhill. 

 

Balance wins. If things go according to plan. That will be our bread and butter. Load the box, we pass it. Don't load the box, and we run it. Easy peasy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, frankw said:

Woof what a pick that turned out to be. Fitterer needs a win. Get that Burns deal today.

Surely overpaying Burns is a win right? lol.

Fitt should have been shown the door with Rhule and co. He has done next to nothing since he has been here, no better than Hurney at drafting after the 1st round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Surely overpaying Burns is a win right? lol.

Fitt should have been shown the door with Rhule and co. He has done next to nothing since he has been here, no better than Hurney at drafting after the 1st round. 

You'd rather let him walk or get much lower value for him in a trade?

No argument about Fitterer he has been given pass after pass here because of Matt Rhule and in truth mainly because he preceded Hurney. The Seahawks have not only been doing fine without him they are actually significantly better and that’s with Geno Smith lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, frankw said:

You'd rather let him walk or get much lower value for him in a trade?

No argument about Fitterer he has been given pass after pass here because of Matt Rhule and in truth mainly because he preceded Hurney. The Seahawks have not only been doing fine without him they are actually significantly better and that’s with Geno Smith lol.

They have to pay him after turning down " The Trade" 

I just dont consider it a "win". That went out the window when we decided a pass rush specialist that is a huge liability in stopping the run was worth more than The Trade. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...