Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots releasing Corral


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

They have to pay him after turning down " The Trade" 

I just dont consider it a "win". That went out the window when we decided a pass rush specialist that is a huge liability in stopping the run was worth more than The Trade

 

The only way "the trade" would have went down is if David Tepper truly is a bottom tier owner and didn't give a poo about winning. If he approves that trade not only is Fitterer gone within the next season our stadium that so many people complain about being filled with opposing fans is going to be a home away from home for every other team for minimum 2 years. Who is going to pay to watch that when we signal we don't give a fug about winning and wave the white flag while we wait for future picks that aren't even guaranteed top ten?

You can acknowledge Fitterer is not living up to the job but also be realistic that trade would have done nothing to save our current roster. In actuality if we dumped Burns we should have dumped Brown and Chinn as well. Then went all in on the offense. That would be the only way to justify it.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, frankw said:

The only way "the trade" would have went down is if David Tepper truly is a bottom tier owner and didn't give a poo about winning. If he approves that trade not only is Fitterer gone within the next season our stadium that so many people complain about being filled with opposing fans is going to be a home away from home for every other team for minimum 2 years. Who is going to pay to watch that when we signal we don't give a fug about winning and wave the white flag while we wait for future picks that aren't even guaranteed top ten?

You can acknowledge Fitterer is not living up to the job but also be realistic that trade would have done nothing to save our current roster. In actuality if we dumped Burns we should have dumped Brown and Chinn as well. Then went all in on the offense. That would be the only way to justify it.

All because of Burns? I just dont see it. He is not that great bro. We were fuging losing anyway. 

This fanbase watched JP, a future HOF, walk for nothing. I am sure we could have gotten over losing a fringe pro bowler. 

Burns is quickly becoming the edge version of Shaq Thompson. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

So...do the folks that claimed that Billythecheat is way too clever for us still believe that drivel? Don't worry, nobody was paying attention anyway. 

 

If Corral winds up on our PS, does that make us smarter than the average bear?

Seriously. All these hypocrites calling Fitterer a dumb dumb for cutting Corral 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

All because of Burns? I just dont see it. He is not that great bro. We were fuging losing anyway. 

This fanbase watched JP, a future HOF, walk for nothing. I am sure we could have gotten over losing a fringe pro bowler. 

It's not just about Burns. I guess we are on different wavelengths in this convo. No problem agree to disagree.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

It's not just about Burns. I guess we are on different wavelengths in this convo. No problem agree to disagree.

Thats cool, my original post was about Fitt being shown the door with Rhule and co. and I still believe that. He is the weak link of our front office imo. 

He might doom Reichs time here with his bad drafting and we will need to rid ourselves of both of them, but will probably just fire Fitt and get a new GM.

I dont want to go into a cycle of new coach, new gm every other year. They should have been hired in the same cycle, Fitt had done nothing to make keeping him a great move and nobody would have had a problem with letting him go. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

So...do the folks that claimed that Billythecheat is way too clever for us still believe that drivel? Don't worry, nobody was paying attention anyway. 

 

If Corral winds up on our PS, does that make us smarter than the average bear?

Considering we traded a third and a fourth for a guy who can barely make the practice squad, I'd say no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@mrcompletely11@Gerry Green

Dammit y'all stop this pissing contest.

I see anything more of it and y'all will be gone for good. Be grateful I'm not banning either one of you right now. First game of the year so I'm free generous, but I won't guarantee I'll stay like this.

If anyone else sees them doing this crap, report it and I'll make sure we don't have any more threads fugged up because of this poo.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Technically speaking, Fields has been a better QB than Bryce Young in the NFL.  I mean it’s bottom rung comparing by BY isn’t better.  Thats what I don’t get about the talk this week.  We don’t have a QB edge 
    • Might be different against a team with no legitimate pass catching options outside of their rookie TE though.  Their #1 WR tomorrow has 8 catches this season, next best WR receptions number this year is 4. If we can't defend that while Horn travels with their TE, then we have some serious problems.   Maybe we don't end up doing that in the end, but it's probably how I'd be scheming up the defense tomorrow when they have only 1 non RB pass catching option.
    • I fought sleep to stay awake just to watch that fumble on the goal line as we were going in for the go ahead score and said fug it, I'm going to bed. I've seen this movie before. I know how this ends. This bullshit of having California teams in conference with east coast teams is trash. That game probably didn't end until 2:30AM. Hell, it was 2AM at the time of the fumble and there was still 3+ minutes to play. In conference games being played into the 2AM hour for local audiences is terrible for the game. And the worst rule in football really does need fixed. Fumbling through the endzone or a fumble recovers by the D in the end zone should not result in a touch back and the ball on the 20. Fumbling through the endzone should not be a turnover. Fumbling out of bounds isn't a turnover anywhere else on the field. That should be the offense's ball on the one yard line. If the D recovers it in the endzone it should be the D's ball on the one yard line. Everyone knows this and everyone talks about it so just fix it already. If Cal was getting the ball at the goal line instead of out to the 20 I would've kept watching. That's a completely different scenario than the ball at the 20.
×
×
  • Create New...