Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A loss to the Saints on MNF would be as bad a start as the Panthers can get.

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)

The Saints have talent but they are not some scary juggernaut. Drew Brees is gone. Now is the time to step up and dick slap these divisional opponents. I'm tired of hearing this bs mantra from folks who wanted immediate results from Rhule now crowing about a rebuild. This conference is weak AF. The Bucs are 2-0 with Baker fuging Mayfield. Do not make excuses for more ineptitude from our front office. If we can't compete in this weaker edition of the current NFL hire someone who can do better.

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, frankw said:

The Saints have talent but they are not some scary juggernaut. Drew Brees is gone. Now is the time to step up and dick slap these divisional opponents. I'm tired of hearing this bs mantra from folks who wanted immediate results from Rhule now crowing about a rebuild. This conference is weak AF. The Bucs are 2-0 with Baker fuging Mayfield. Do not make excuses for more ineptitude from our front office. If we can't compete in this weaker edition of the current NFL hire someone who can do better.

Tepper is the problem. These HC's we hire are his decision.

 

Not sure why he thought is was a good idea to hire a HC who was fired. The excuses has to stop. We blaming everybody but Tepper.

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

I’m more concern about handing a top 5 pick to Chicago 

I would like to give them a lower pick just because it means we had a good season.  I dont understand why people would care what pick we give them, we can't use it anyway.  If we have a bad season, I'd rather have a high second round pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tepper is the problem. These HC's we hire are his decision.

 

Not sure why he thought is was a good idea to hire a HC who was fired. The excuses has to stop. We blaming everybody but Tepper.

 

 

I have been blaming Tepper since he hired a wildly unqualified college coach who didn’t even beat a ranked team to a fully guaranteed $60m contact.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's year one of a rebuild 

I really can't stand this narrative that people have built up in their heads to accept a poor season that gives the Bears a top pick in a QB heavy draft.  We were 7-9, in the playoff hunt in the final week of the season, improved the coaching staff and kept the same starters or got better at every position except #1 WR.

That's not a rebuild, it's just year 1 of a new staff/QB combo, but given what we had last year, it's still an improvement.

If this really was year 1 of a true rebuild, you don't trade away your next year's first round pick.  I'd have had no issues with a rebuild, but if that's what we were doing, we did it terribly.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • travisura
      Favorite Packer Panthers memory

      By travisura · Posted

      “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • strato
      Favorite Packer Panthers memory

      By strato · Posted

      Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • TD alt
      Nick Scott may be doing better than thought.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...