Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport: Shaq likely done for year


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, toldozer said:

I'd assume luvu.  I'm a little bit intrigued to see if Chinn could take over that spot. He's probably too small but he does nothing in his current role

Hill was making plays all over the field, once he came in, just like he was doing in preseason.  

Even sacked Carr on a crucial 3rd and 2 play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I personally think Shaq is a bit overpaid and overrated.  Not strong in coverage and he gets lost at times.  Some love him, I get that, but I have not visibly seen anything close to Beason, Morgan, Mills, or Luke-

He's been better are on par with Beason who was highly overrated by this fan base. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, toldozer said:

I'd assume luvu.  I'm a little bit intrigued to see if Chinn could take over that spot. He's probably too small but he does nothing in his current role

Call me a casual or whatever, but I’ve forgotten Chinn existed for long stretches this year and last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...