Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post Mortem: Game 2


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, davos said:

The omission of concepts shouldn't limit what we're giving Young.  You create a more limiting system within the same concept and grow it from there for these guys.  This doesn't look like we're pulling anything from successful modern offenses.  The framework isn't there. 

Does Young have the arm to make those throws?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Also, quick note to the "everything sucks and everybody needs to be cut or fired" crowd that no doubt will want to come in and sh-t all over everything with weeping and wailing, grashing of teeth and absolute assurance that this team will never be any good and it all must be burned down as soon as possible...

Yeah sorry , not interested 😁

You can have your opinions. I have mine. And if you don't like mine (or me) afraid that's not really high on my list of concerns... especially not right now. There are much bigger things on my mind than this.

So if I don't pay a whole lot of attention to whatever criticism or critique you have, afraid you'll just have to deal with it for now. Got more important things to worry about.

If you wanna discuss actual football stuff, cool. But if your whole argument is basically "everything sucks"?

Yeah, don't care 🙄

And still with all that, and how bad the offense looked most of the game, we are 2 miraculous catches from Olave and Thomas from probably winning that game....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Does Young have the arm to make those throws?

Absolutely.  

What I'm just getting at is that this looks unfortunately similar to Frank's Indy offense .  It's dissapointing because he sold us that they were developing something new, learning from his past.  It's quite evident, it's not us easing Bryce into anything, the offense is not in the mold of the more popular stretch zone style stuff that's all the rage.  The forefront offenses are all about stretching defenses horizontally--then countering with bunch formations and pre-snap motions to keep them on their feet just when the defense thinks they're getting a handle.  It's about a rhythm between those calls.  Play designs allow for high percentage targets early and naturally opens the field up.  Has made life easy on Purdy, Tua, and Baker thus far this year.    

We're just not implementing any concepts that stretch the field and open the D up.  We're in single back, shotgun, and pistol, running triangle patterns (vertical and horiz stretching is combined).  So we're just running stuff like a snag pattern and Bryce is natural drifting to his right with the corner route as primary.  In concept, this should leave some easy guys open, but it has been more often just the RB that runs to the flat/rail and Bryce sends it off for a short gain.    

They have been bragging about how high a percentage they've been able to install with Bryce already so this isn't some limited portion of it.  

What they've installed seems very antiquated (early 2010s)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah he has Dell and 0 else

You are crazy if you are overlooking Nico Collins… the guy will probably be one of the best receivers in the AFC this year. He has boom potential written all over him. Even when the Texans drafted him people were foaming bc of his abilities.
 

Dell

Collins
Metchie
Schultz 

woods

 

that is a great group of receivers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

As far as Sanders, no he hasn't accomplished anything significant yet. It's still just a couple of games against subpar opponents. His next two games are going to be a lot more challenging.

I'd add that if you're hoping for Sanders to become a pro coach, you can drop that idea. He's already stated that he doesn't want to coach at the pro level.

Sanders won’t go pro bc he is taking advantage of the NIL. Sanders and his investors are pretty brilliant right now … they aren’t just coaching football, they are treating college football like a professional futbol club in Europe.

the strategy in Europe is that if you buy a futbol club and pump money into it and buy players then you will bring more fans and more money into club’s revenue streams. Then the club gets promoted and the owners become filthy rich.

 

sanders is doing the exact same thing with Colorado. He is making so much money on the growth of the fan base and popularity. He shared in a podcast that he has a % revenue in his contract with Colorado. So he isn’t just making his coaching salary, but he profiting off of their popularity and merch sales. 
 

this is an example of how NIL is ruining college football, bc the next “Deion” is gonna so the same thing to another losing school. Eventually, these kids will be treated like futbol players and go where the biggest money opportunity is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, joemac said:

299 yards on 71 attempts is......something.  Thats for sure.  But hes throwing to a bunch of guys who would be WR3/4 at best on any other team. 

You're not wrong, but some of the same posters pointing out a talent issue are also trying to praise Fitt for the job he’s doing. You can’t have it both ways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, davos said:

Absolutely.  

What I'm just getting at is that this looks unfortunately similar to Frank's Indy offense .  It's dissapointing because he sold us that they were developing something new, learning from his past.  It's quite evident, it's not us easing Bryce into anything, the offense is not in the mold of the more popular stretch zone style stuff that's all the rage.  The forefront offenses are all about stretching defenses horizontally--then countering with bunch formations and pre-snap motions to keep them on their feet just when the defense thinks they're getting a handle.  It's about a rhythm between those calls.  Play designs allow for high percentage targets early and naturally opens the field up.  Has made life easy on Purdy, Tua, and Baker thus far this year.    

We're just not implementing any concepts that stretch the field and open the D up.  We're in single back, shotgun, and pistol, running triangle patterns (vertical and horiz stretching is combined).  So we're just running stuff like a snag pattern and Bryce is natural drifting to his right with the corner route as primary.  In concept, this should leave some easy guys open, but it has been more often just the RB that runs to the flat/rail and Bryce sends it off for a short gain.    

They have been bragging about how high a percentage they've been able to install with Bryce already so this isn't some limited portion of it.  

What they've installed seems very antiquated (early 2010s)

I've been talking to some Indy fans on Twitter and they are saying the exact same things.  Its Frank.  Also its our awful weapons, but Frank could innovate and scheme some guys open every once and a while.  Its beyond time to turn the reigns over to Brown.  Why get a guy like that if you don't want him to call plays?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

I've been talking to some Indy fans on Twitter and they are saying the exact same things.  Its Frank.  Also its our awful weapons, but Frank could innovate and scheme some guys open every once and a while.  Its beyond time to turn the reigns over to Brown.  Why get a guy like that if you don't want him to call plays?

Only thing that comes to mind is that Brown has never called plays before. We're not privy to the inside conversations but I assume the plan is to hand the reigns over at some point, but who knows what criteria they're looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, joemac said:

299 yards on 71 attempts is......something.  Thats for sure.  But hes throwing to a bunch of guys who would be WR3/4 at best on any other team. 

yeah I can’t really evaluate Young. There’s legitimately nothing there. More concerning though is that it isn’t just talent, they were incredibly, incredibly vanilla in the first half.
 

They opened it up a bit in the second half but the athleticism at the WR position was still an Achilles heel and once the dam broke at CB-probably for good as it pertains this season-the game felt out of reach even being down by just a few. Failing to connect on the big Mingo pass was probably a potential game changer, but honestly you’ve got to try teams down the field more than that 

second game in a row where we’re sitting here talking about that *one* missed opportunity in the passing game.

i suspect this is probably an extension of training camp and Young and the receivers haven’t developed good timing with one another down the field. Young is used to throwing to guys a lot faster than terrace Marshall (who did absolutely nothing last night) which would explain why these passes are just a bit long

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

yeah I can’t really evaluate Young. There’s legitimately nothing there. More concerning though is that it isn’t just talent, they were incredibly, incredibly vanilla in the first half.
 

They opened it up a bit in the second half but the athleticism at the WR position was still an Achilles heel and once the dam broke at CB-probably for good as it pertains this season-the game felt out of reach even being down by just a few. Failing to connect on the big Mingo pass was probably a potential game changer, but honestly you’ve got to try teams down the field more than that 

second game in a row where we’re sitting here talking about that *one* missed opportunity in the passing game.

i suspect this is probably an extension of training camp and Young and the receivers haven’t developed good timing with one another down the field. Young is used to throwing to guys a lot faster than terrace Marshall (who did absolutely nothing last night) which would explain why these passes are just a bit long

I'm not sure why we didn't at least attempt a go ball or 2 with Chark, who is supposed to be one of the fastest guys in the league, and is also 6'4".  This offense reminds me of the Jeff Davidson led offenses which were putrid to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three things that I noticed last night. First was something I already felt. Marshall isn’t good enough to be our answer at WR. The team seems to agree a bit as Mingo was out there a lot. I would like to see the snaps. Second is way more concerning. Granderson, who has a career high 5.5 sacks, looked like a monster against Iky. Third, Burns seemed to be easily handled by Ramzyck (I think it was him mainly) with a simple chip or just by himself.

I will say that I missed parts of the game, but I didn’t feel good about 2 or 3. 1 was as expected to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...