Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Run the Ball Reich


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Because they will "ram it up the gut" on 1st and 2nd down, then throw out of the shotgun. You have to mix up play calls out of the same formations to keep the defense off of their mark, similar to what allowed Sam to really thrive in 2022. 

You don't run out of an under center look and then go shotgun to throw every time like we saw. There is zero flow to play calling right now and it's like Reich is shooting from the hip. They need to get Bryce comfortable with running the pass game and run game from under center.

 

This guy knows his football 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders looks like he is running through mud and Chuba can't catch out of the backfield. The "offensive line" is supposed to be better run blockers then pass blockers, haven't seen it. As it stands now, they are a subpar group. 

Cant sustain a running game by constantly going up the middle for two yards.

Just the reality of the situation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reich did try to run the ball last night but wasn't successful on 1st or 2nd down and expected Bryce to save us on 3rd and long. I think the real issue is our interior offensive line. Christensen is done for the year, Corbett is out. We got a rookie and an undrafted free agent at both guards. These guys were beat left and right and couldn't open up any holes for Sanders. Philly's line is one of the best in the league and any RB can run behind it. 

This team is devoid of talent at the moment and I do blame Fitt for lack of depth at positions. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The entire opposing D is within 10 yards of the LOS most plays. We had a 3rd and 9 last night and the Saints had 9 men on the LOS and the safeties were standing at the first down sticks. Until we can create some sort of down field threat life is going to be very difficult on offense. Defenses are just keying on the run and short passing game because that's all we've been able to execute so far.

Which is why it's so weird we're not trying to stretch the defense horizontally.  We don't have the personnel to stretch vertically (arguably do with Mingo and Chark meeting potential), but are still running triangle concepts that the defense is easily diagnosing.  

I have officially given up on TMJ however.  

Reich was able to open guys up in the middle of the field for Rivers and Wentz with that Hi-Lo and mesh stuff and we're just not really doing any of that.  Lots of snag routes or plays where everyone's leaning one way and ~one guy to dump off to the counter.  We're just not not isolating the right guys or designing for favorable matchups with our personnel. 

And then in that, without the ability to get decent separation, the 3 on 2s Reich likes to make get obliterated pretty quickly with Marshall tripping on his dick.

My take is that we absolutely need Shenault in there right now along with a burner RB; need to have a hard focus on stretching things out to open the flat for Bryce.     

They gave us all these fluff pieces (like below), but reality is, Reich is still just using Reich.  Very little from the McVay/Shanahan tree.

https://www.panthers.com/news/how-thomas-brown-and-frank-reich-blended-offensive-philosophies

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

19 rushes total with only 10 coming from your $24 million running back isn't going to win games Reich. Get it together.

Sanders didn't need more touches.  Hubbard did.  He didn't get a rush until the 4th quarter.   And he drastically out played Sanders week 1. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I wish people would stop referencing Darnold last year like he had some come to Jesus moment with Wilks. 
Any person with a lick of sense would see that Wilks and co did everything they could to make Darnold not a factor because they couldn’t trust him. 
Also the Saints game. 

They did what would make Darnold successful, which is play action pass. And guess what? Bryce has the LOWEST QBR in the league right now which, to my best recollection, Sam never had, even with the poo show that was the Jets with Gase and Rhule here.

So there is that. Flame Darnold all you want but he was Top 10 in QBR down the stretch, and we won that game against the Saints, unlike last night, because of Wilks philosophical change on offense.

You've disproven your own argument now run along, you have a Bryce Fan Club meeting at noon.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Sanders didn't need more touches.  Hubbard did.  He didn't get a rush until the 4th quarter.   And he drastically out played Sanders week 1. 

Yea I didn't understand the lack of Hubbard this week. 

He was in mostly on 3rd downs and obviously passing plays, the great receiver that he is. 

Exciting to see if Cohen is back. Definitely will be an adding boost to this offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jmac said:

Sanders looks like he is running through mud and Chuba can't catch out of the backfield. The "offensive line" is supposed to be better run blockers then pass blockers, haven't seen it. As it stands now, they are a subpar group. 

Cant sustain a running game by constantly going up the middle for two yards.

Just the reality of the situation.

May need to revise your opinion on Hubbard.  He was our second leading receiver last night.  Here's the stat line:

image.png.ad807b0eee658de97cef72b76593532a.png

In fact, Chuba has caught all 7 of his targets this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...