Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we trade for a WR1?


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hindsight is always 20/20 but in hindsight the obvious answer was to pay Reddick (a lot less than Burns would require) and take the haul for Burns. Oh well.

And keep CMC and Moore for Young. Hindsight is always 20/20, but it sure seems like most of the realistic fans have better ideas than what the team actually does. Oh, but we can’t play GM.

Here’s one to gnaw on, the trade value we gave up and used to draft Corral and DJ Johnson is almost the same as the trade value we got for CMC. We gave up more to get Darnold than we got for CMC. We gave up about half the trade value we got for CMC to get CJ Henderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It was always utterly baffling to trade our only proven WR as part of a package to trade up to draft our QB. When I saw the news of the trade come scrolling across the ESPN ticker while sipping a beer at Ass Clown Brewing (how prescient of an omen that has been given how Bryce has looked thus far) my very first initial reaction was, "Okay, well who the fug is this kid gonna throw to?"

"WR are easier to replace than pass rushers" - Fitt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

so far, Fit has found neither or have trade them or let them walk in FA

While Fitts doesn't deserve any credit for it we're currently 5th in the NFL in sacks. Rushing the passer isn't our problem. Hell, pretty much all of our problems revolve around the offensive passing game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It was always utterly baffling to trade our only proven WR as part of a package to trade up to draft our QB. When I saw the news of the trade come scrolling across the ESPN ticker while sipping a beer at Ass Clown Brewing (how prescient of an omen that has been given how Bryce has looked thus far) my very first initial reaction was, "Okay, well who the fug is this kid gonna throw to?"

yeah only a clown would  move up & draft an undersized rookie QB & all at the same time trade away his bona fide #1 WR not something instead an NFL GM would actually decide to do...just saying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the best option is trading Chinn for Jameson Williams and a conditional pick. Vonn Bell and Xavier Woods have done well at Safety. 

I don't think Burns should be traded until the draft order is finalized at the end of the regular season. Need to see at least what Haynes looks like after returning from short-term IR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't have to be solved in one year. 3 teams pop into my head right away with how they handled supplying weapons around their young QBs. Philly, Miami and Buffalo.

Philly: QB 2020, 1st round WR 2021 (Devonta Smith), Trade WR 2022 (AJ Brown)

Miami: QB 2020, 1st round WR 2021 (Jaylen Waddle), Trade WR 2022 (Tyreek Hill)

Buffalo: QB 2018, FA WR 2019 (John Brown), Trade WR 2020 (Stefon Diggs)

There are potential WR trade targets that won't cost 1st round picks, their will probably be an undervalued free agent WRs, team is currently likely will use use their second rounder on another weapon too like it did with Mingo this past year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Burrow took off once he had Chase. They were able to draft Chase because “rebuilding” teams have 1st rounders!

So not only did we trade away our WR1 but we also traded away our best shot at finding one the following year 

Herein lies the problem. We didn't suck enough last year to be rewarded with a top quarterback during the draft this year, so our wonderful GM and his brass balls owner traded up to draft BY and justified it by saying "we don't plan on picking high next year".

Fitterer literally said this...and he looks stupid right now.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
    • Man, that is a lot of guys that played meaningful snaps for us last year we are letting test free agency... Kind of worried we are going to lose Yosh
×
×
  • Create New...