Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terrified Cj stroud will be a stud


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

He's had a pretty good connection percentage with Theilen, and hasn't really targeted Chark. The only receiver whose been targeted plenty with a low connection rate is Mingo. 

So where are all these drops coming from?

I remember a bad drop from Mingo on a slant on 3rd down. But yeah, I don't think Bryce's mom could come up with a dozen plus plays where receivers botched a tremendous throw from Bryce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

He's had a pretty good connection percentage with Theilen, and hasn't really targeted Chark. The only receiver whose been targeted plenty with a low connection rate is Mingo. 

So where are all these drops coming from?

Our wide receivers literally havent dropped anything YET outside of Mingo last week. Thank you for pointing out another fact and not an opinion. Lol 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

I NEVER said that. I said his guys are open and he's finding them. He's playing very well. They were always 1a and 1b in the draft to me. Just who fits your offense. 

Fair enough - i would say the Texans scheme simply seems much better than ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Our wide receivers literally havent dropped anything YET outside of Mingo last week. Thank you for pointing out another fact and not an opinion. Lol 

Dropped or couldn't get to. That doesn't mean they dropped it. That means they didn't make a play on a ball that was put where it should be. 

But you guys are right. We'll just pray to get another QB in 2025 or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Dropped or couldn't get to. That doesn't mean they dropped it. That means they didn't make a play on a ball that was put where it should be. 

But you guys are right. We'll just pray to get another QB in 2025 or so. 

So bryce has been putting all his passes where they should be? You sure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I don't think the ex-NFL LB would have let his Front Office draft a 5'10", 180lb LB.

He knows how likely he is to get injured. 

I don’t think anyone was talking the Tepper’s out of drafting Bryce

The last time the Tepper’s let the coach take a player over the QB they wanted we ended up with Horn over Fields. No chance we traded what we traded without David/Nicole getting the QB they wanted 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

1 in 3 drop backs he has no where to go with the football. My money is on it not being that difficult.

That's not what the poster was saying. He was saying he could find a dozen plus plays where a receiver either dropped a ball or failed to make a play on a well thrown ball. Our receivers aren't doing a good job getting open and our play calling sucks. I don't think anyone would attempt to refute those realities.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...