Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ffs start Dalton all season

RumHam

By RumHam,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BombzAway Enthusiast

BombzAway

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Need to stick with Dalton until he implodes. Young is not ready yet. Let him learn and study more.

Problem with this idea is why go all in and trade future picks? They could have just went with Dalton and then picked from the many good looking QBs in next years draft while not giving away picks. This group has made misstep after misstep under Tepper. Hard to see them getting it right without pure f'n luck.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BombzAway said:

Problem with this idea is why go all in and trade future picks? They could have just went with Dalton and then picked from the many good looking QBs in next years draft while not giving away picks. This group has made misstep after misstep under Tepper. Hard to see them getting it right without pure f'n luck.

We didn't draft Young to be good immediately.  We drafted him to be good for the next 10-12 years, (if he works out).  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted

Huddle the last four years: Why do we keep taking retread QBs from other teams and expect different results? It’s time to get our own guy and develop them for the long haul. 

Also Huddle after 2 games of a rookie and 3 quarters of Andy Dalton: I’ve seen enough, let’s play the guy who has been on 4 different teams the last 4 years for the rest of the year.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

It wasn't their D. The 12thvman deserves game ball. 

It’s was their D that allowed Frank slightly more success than we had been having with his whack scheme and our talent. Seattle’s D has been a dumpster fire through 3 games. Notch Rd , Lexington,

But I do agree home field and noise aided them big time today.  Like it always does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Huddle the last four years: Why do we keep taking retread QBs from other teams and expect different results? It’s time to get our own guy and develop them for the long haul. 

Also Huddle after 2 games of a rookie and 3 quarters of Andy Dalton: I’ve seen enough, let’s play the guy who has been on 4 different teams the last 4 years for the rest of the year.

Wish I could pie this 100 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...