Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best and Worst of Week 4 per PFF


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

Offense

1. WR Laviska Shenault Jr.: 81.3
2. WR Adam Thielen: 73.5
3. WR Terrace Marshall Jr.: 71.4
4. LT Ikem Ekwonu: 70.4
5. RB Chuba Hubbard: 67.4

14. RB Miles Sanders: 55.2
15. WR Ihmir Smith-Marsette: 54.0
16. TE Giovanni Ricci: 52.3
17. TE Hayden Hurst: 44.0
18. LG Chandler Zavala: 37.0

Defense

1. S Jeremy Chinn: 85.0
2. CB Troy Hill: 76.7
3. S Sam Franklin Jr.: 75.5
4. OLB Amaré Barno: 69.7
5. OLB DJ Johnson: 67.2

16. OLB Brian Burns: 47.4
17. DE LaBryan Ray: 47.0
18. DT Nick Thurman: 44.9
19. DT DeShawn Williams: 40.6
20. CB D’Shawn Jamison: 38.7

Panthers PFF grades: Best and worst from Week 4 loss to Vikings (usatoday.com)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There has to be a better option than Zavala. He's our worst player every week.

Easily, and it's having a ripple effect across the entire offense. There's no good reason for them not to have brought in a veteran at this point. Even Throckmorton is playing better than Zavala.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get it that Zavala is a rookie that they're high on his potential but he's not improving. He missed quite a bit of crucial time on camp and preseason and he's just not ready. It's time to take a redshirt approach on him. You can't let a guy just get ragdolled every week further hamstringing your struggling offense with the hope of him improving. You gotta play somebody else.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There has to be a better option than Zavala. He's our worst player every week.

Since moving to the left side.  His opening game at RG wasn't too bad.  It's crazy, but the left side is his natural spot.  It may be he's a better fit at RG in the NFL.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I get it that Zavala is a rookie that they're high on his potential but he's not improving. He missed quite a bit of crucial time on camp and preseason and he's just not ready. It's time to take a redshirt approach on him. You can't let a guy just get ragdolled every week further hamstringing your struggling offense with the hope of him improving. You gotta play somebody else.

He went from a 0 to a 37.  That's technically improving it's just still terrible....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...