Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's Burns worth at this point?


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

Trade him to whoever delivers a first this year. A player is a bonus.

My choice: Call Belichick now and get their 2024 #1 and 2026 #1 or 2025 #2 and maybe JuJu or Hunter Henry. He has been embarrassed the last two weeks (losing 72-3) and he's not going out like that. He's not drafting a rookie QB again, no matter who it is. He'll sign Cousins for a last attempt at a run.

Roll with Bryce, Mingo, JuJu and the new #1 receiver in 2024. If it doesn't work, on to 2025.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not worth 2 first rounders. He's worth 1 first rounder now. His position and skill demands that price. Just because we are ass as a team does it mean Burns isn't worth that anymore. He will not garner 2 first rounders ever again. Unless there's a team that's in the hunt and their pass rusher goes down, you won't see anything as high as what the rams were offering. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Are there any posters still not wanting to do that trade?

I would bring up the original thread where I said trade his ass at the time, but they locked it so no zombie thread. A lot of Huddlers were trying to argue with me that he was worth more than that, and we had to have him here, and we could never replace him in the draft. Of course they sound idiotic now, and we obviously should have taken the deal. I was going crazy in that thread for Fitt to take the deal. Now it's just a countdown to Fitt being fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point it’s just pay the man, team is far away from competing and him and brown are the only real pieces on the defense to build around 

when I say pay I mean meet in the middle, that would be the logical thing to do but trading him with fitts under control still, will just be the icing on the cake for such a terribly ran clown show this team has become 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

At this point it’s just pay the man, team is far away from competing and him and brown are the only real pieces on the defense to build around 

when I say pay I mean meet in the middle, that would be the logical thing to do but trading him with fitts under control still, will just be the icing on the cake for such a terribly ran clown show this team has become 

Strongly disagree. This is the thinking that has us here right now. Paying him will do absolutely nothing positive. If he signs that extension on October 9, people will hate him and call his contract an albatross by October 12--if it takes that long.

We get on this treadmill of, "we have to pay so and so" and on and on it goes until we can't wait to get them out of here as they're deemed "overpaid". It happened with KK and bunch of other defenders, and it even happened with Cam, CMC, and DJ on the offensive side of the ball. I believe there was total Huddle frustration over the old regime paying people to "keep them in the family".

No, get Burns out of here ASAP. Send him to New England. They're not making the playoffs in that division even with Burns, but at least they won't be embarrassed. Belichick will give up 2 #1's. On the back of the last two weeks, now is the time to strike while the iron is hot. I know we like to stare at our navels, but they look way worse than we do.

Fitt should have had a voicemail waiting on Bill as soon as he finished his presser.

Edited by BrisbanePanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

Strongly disagree. This is the thinking that has us here right now. Paying him will do absolutely nothing positive. If he signs that extension on October 9, people will hate him and call his contract an albatross by October 12--if it takes that long.

We get on this treadmill of, "we have to pay so and so" and on and on it goes until we can't wait to get them out of here as they're deemed "overpaid". It happened with KK and bunch of other defenders, and it even happened with Cam, CMC, and DJ on the offensive side of the ball. I believe there was total Huddle frustration over the old regime paying people to "keep them in the family".

No, get Burns out of here ASAP. Send him to New England. They're not making the playoffs in that division even with Burns, but at least they won't be embarrassed. Belichick will give up 2 #1's. On the back of the last two weeks, now is the time to strike while the iron is hot. I know we like to stare at our navels, but they look way worse than we do.

Fitt should have had a voicemail waiting on Bill as soon as he finished his presser.

I disagree, and it’s sorta why we’re at where we’re at, if we are firing fitts and hiring a competent gm, which is a stretch with this ownership, and the new gm thinks it’s a good ideal sure but as it stands currently, fitts has traded more talent from this team than he has replaced and we’re seeing the result of that with this current team. 

comparing this to KK is not close imo, kk was 28 when we extended him I believe, burns is 25, short never had a season close to 2015 again after the extension, burns has at least been a consistent fridge double digit sack guy. Like I said pay him and meet in the middle, this is all while being on a team that offense rarely has the lead 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though we're bad and think he's not worth a ton anymore, he still holds A LOT of value.  The market dictates, not our dejection with the team, and pass rushers are the most coveted dudes after QB.  42 sacks by age 25, went from bad to just below-average against the run.  People can act all deflated here but I do think he's worth a first and then some.  We're just probably not getting close to (2) firsts.  

Rams got lucky-- our trade didn't happen and they landed 2 super promising rookies in Byron Young and Kobie Turner.  

It's gotta be a team with a shot but not convincing anyone yet, and of course a clear need.

Baltimore is the one I could see. Oweh is unimpressive and injured, they had to sign Clowney who's been average.  They've got plenty future picks in tact and tradeable talent.  2024 1st and Patrick Queen (contract year, they declined his 5th yr).  Something like that could be juicy.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question is directed to all of you guys upset about not trading Burns last year.  If we made that trade, do you honestly believe it would have made us significantly better this season? I see nothing from the current FO to suggest we would have picked the right player with the choice this year or that they would do so with an extra # 1 in 2024.

Take a look at our drafts from 2021-2023. How many players have made a significant impact on the team? We consistently trade up or down to pick JAGS (or worse) and pass over great players in the process. We trade away 2nd and 3rd round players who couldn’t start on a contender in the NFL (ex: Darnold and CJ Henderson). The FO has not shown the ability to properly evaluate talent. If I were Tepper there is no way I’d let Fitz trade Burns unless I already knew I’d be bringing in a competent GM to replace him in 2024.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

This question is directed to all of you guys upset about not trading Burns last year.  If we made that trade, do you honestly believe it would have made us significantly better this season? I see nothing from the current FO to suggest we would have picked the right player with the choice this year or that they would do so with an extra # 1 in 2024.

Take a look at our drafts from 2021-2023. How many players have made a significant impact on the team? We consistently trade up or down to pick JAGS (or worse) and pass over great players in the process. We trade away 2nd and 3rd round players who couldn’t start on a contender in the NFL (ex: Darnold and CJ Henderson). The FO has not shown the ability to properly evaluate talent. If I were Tepper there is no way I’d let Fitz trade Burns unless I already knew I’d be bringing in a competent GM to replace him in 2024.

 

You cannot look at those things in a vacuum.  The Rams clearly overvalued burns and fitt didnt pounce.  Having that draft capital is huge for many many reasons.    Also in regards to this season, anyone objectivily looking at this franchise and roster could see we were (God knows how far off we are now) but we were a couple seasons out from being a top tier team if things went our way.

 

So in closing fitt fuged up and it should cost him his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Purpose This study investigates the interplay between strategic goals and calculative practices, specifically Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA). Drawing on practice-based theories, the research aims to understand how managers strategize with CPA, including the balancing of financial and strategic objectives and the interplay of institutionalized practices with individual practitioners’ actions. Design The study uses a qualitative, revelatory, and exploratory case study approach at the sub-organizational level in a manufacturing company. The researchers compare CPA practices across six departments, guided by a phenomenological research design. Data collection methods include informal conversations, qualitative observations, written documentation, numerical evidence from the accounting system, and interviews. Findings The study offers four novel findings to the field. First, it highlights how managers employ procedural and interactive strategizing to reframe CPA practices. The sophistication of CPA practices increases with unevenly distributed customer volume, high customer-specific, controllable overhead, customer-to-customer interaction, and service complexity. Conversely, the sophistication of cost-focused CPA practices tends to decrease with diverse strategic goals. Additionally, CPA become more effective through the utilization of non-financial information, employee empowerment, localization, and strategic alignment. Second, CPA can be adapted through integrative strategizing where managers avoid using it as a financial benchmark for strategic initiatives. Third, accountants actively seek intermediary roles to incorporate arguments from strategy and marketing to balance strategic objectives–contrary to their portrayal as myopic guardians of profitability. Fourth, the localization of CPA practices to front-line employees compensates for a lack of sophisticated CPA practices. Future research Future research should, investigate the adaptation of calculative practices in different cultures, and industries. Exploring additional contextual factors such as uncertainty, management characteristics, and linguistic framing of practices would be beneficial. Examining the interactions in utilizing CPA practices between front-line staff and customers would shed light on their effectiveness. Lastly, investigating the role of consultants in diffusing such practices would offer valuable perspectives.
    • Management accounting for strategic decision making takes center stage in the business world. Dive into the intricate realm of financial data analysis and its pivotal role in shaping organizational strategies for success. Learn how key performance indicators, budgeting, and cost-volume-profit analysis drive informed decision-making, leading to sustainable growth and competitive advantage. Overview of Management Accounting for Strategic Decision Making Management accounting plays a crucial role in helping organizations make strategic decisions by providing valuable financial information and analysis. It involves the process of identifying, measuring, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating financial information to support management in making informed decisions. Importance of Management Accounting in Guiding Strategic Decisions, Management accounting for strategic decision making Management accounting is essential for guiding strategic decisions as it provides insights into the financial health of the organization, helps in assessing performance, and aids in forecasting future outcomes. By utilizing management accounting techniques, organizations can effectively allocate resources, identify areas for improvement, and evaluate the impact of strategic decisions on profitability and growth. Cost analysis: Management accounting helps in analyzing the cost structure of the organization, identifying cost drivers, and determining the profitability of products or services. This information is crucial for making pricing decisions and optimizing the use of resources. Budgeting and forecasting: Through budgeting and forecasting, management accountants can help organizations set realistic financial goals, monitor performance against targets, and adjust strategies as needed to achieve desired outcomes. Performance measurement: Management accounting enables organizations to track key performance indicators (KPIs), measure performance against benchmarks, and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies in achieving organizational objectives. Examples of How Management Accounting Influences Strategic Planning Management accounting influences strategic planning in various ways, such as: Scenario analysis: Management accountants can create different scenarios based on varying assumptions to help organizations evaluate the potential outcomes of different strategic decisions and choose the most favorable course of action. Capital budgeting: Management accounting techniques like net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are used to evaluate investment opportunities, assess their long-term financial impact, and prioritize projects that align with strategic goals. Variance analysis: By comparing actual performance against budgeted or expected results, management accountants can identify areas of concern, investigate deviations, and recommend corrective actions to ensure strategic objectives are met.
    • What is Management Accounting? The main objective of management accounting is collecting and analyzing operational data, transforming it into actionable insights for strategic and operational decision-making. This involves detailed analysis and reporting on revenue, costs, budgets, and performance metrics, enabling management accountants to forecast trends, support budget preparation, perform cost analyses, and guide financial decisions within the organization. Importance of Defining the Scope of Management Accounting Understanding the scope of management accounting is important for the following reasons: Leaders gain financial insights for strategic decision-makin   Operations become more streamlined and productivity increases Effective business strategy planning and execution are facilitated Financial risks are identified and mitigated effectively Organizations can set and achieve performance improvement goals Adherence to financial regulations and standards is ensured Opportunities for cost savings and better resource management enhance value creation The integration of new technologies improves efficiency and analytical capabilities Scope of Management Accounting The scope of management accounting covers the following: 1. Variance Analysis Variance analysis comes under the scope of management accounting. It involves tracking differences between budgeted and actual figures and analyzing the causes and implications of these variances. This helps management understand why variances occurred and their potential impact on future operations. This detailed analysis typically includes various types of variances such as sales volume, material cost, labor efficiency, and overhead variances, each providing specific insights into different areas of business performance.
×
×
  • Create New...