Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns statline: 2 tackles, 0 sacks


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, RumHam said:

I see people saying well he's getting double teamed all the time and there's no one else stepping up around him. I never saw him doubled yesterday at all.

He doesn't get double teamed (at least not to a noticeable degree, I'm sure some advanced stat somewhere will say he is). 

He occasionally gets chipped - but generally he's not given any special attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, chknwing said:

his low production is by evero design to get him to take less money.  were not winning the superbowl this year but if we can bring burns expectation down a little we can resign him to a team friendly deal.

No way that is true. That sounds like a conspiracy movie. He just isnt consistent, its as simple as that

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

2 1sts and pick 36 in the last draft. It was such a good offer

Also, for those of you who always say edge rushers are so hard to find, blah, blah. Just like Reddick was a FA a couple year ago like Judon as well, I’m watching Leonard Floyd who has 6.5 sacks this year after being released by the Rams this offseason. It’s really not as hard as people think and the rest of the bounty would have been nice for Young to get some weapons.

hell yes youre right. That trade was AMAZING now looking at it from today and I wish we would have jumped on it fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Prickles said:

hell yes youre right. That trade was AMAZING now looking at it from today and I wish we would have jumped on it fast.

It was amazing. Floyd is $9M this season and will likely be a but more than half of what we pay Burns longer term.

I’m glad for Moore looking great this year but we should have traded him for Green Bay’s 1st last year as well compared to the pick swap (2nd instead of 1st) we got this year. We lost a ton of value by waiting and trying to win our putrid division. I wanted to make the playoffs because hell, we didn’t do any trades but even if we made it, we get stomped by Dallas like Tampa did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too get upset with Burns when during gamedays when it seems more often than not he's invisible for 75% of it, but looking at it in a way that's charitable to Burns:

Burns: 7 TFL, 9 QB hits, 4 sacks, 1 FF

Bosa: 5 TFL, 16 QB hits, 2.5 sacks, 1 PD

Bosa is hitting the QB more but Burns has more TFL and has actually brought QBs down at a more frequent pace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides that ONE quarter in the FIRST half against failcons, hes barely been on the radar. 

The tag is looking like a gift at this stage. 

Yea he and his camp can claim "hes playing hurt", so is 100% of the others brah. 

Hes had other matchup favors and still get no results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...