Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR Target Efficiency


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Never underestimate the level of fugtardery this leadership group can achieve. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Pretty wild that we brought in these weapons to help get Cam over the hump only to take them away when it's time to get a new franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bryce wasn't worth the trade

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bears would have taken other offers from us if we included DBrown or BBurns. Their top guy was DJ Moore but they were open to others. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...