Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR Target Efficiency


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Never underestimate the level of fugtardery this leadership group can achieve. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Pretty wild that we brought in these weapons to help get Cam over the hump only to take them away when it's time to get a new franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bryce wasn't worth the trade

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bears would have taken other offers from us if we included DBrown or BBurns. Their top guy was DJ Moore but they were open to others. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...