Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 good players out of 31 draft picks


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

Only people right in this thread so far are the ones calling out that all teams essentially have bad drafting luck like this outside of the first three rounds. Do a similar chart for other teams outside of the usual winners with the best coaches and you’ll see the same. 
 

With that said, we’ve got to get better with our second rounders. 
 

This is why it kills me when anyone wants to trade one of our proven drafted players for picks who will likely be complete busts.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, falconlynx said:

Only people right in this thread so far are the ones calling out that all teams essentially have bad drafting luck like this outside of the first three rounds. Do a similar chart for other teams outside of the usual winners with the best coaches and you’ll see the same. 
 

With that said, we’ve got to get better with our second rounders. 
 

This is why it kills me when anyone wants to trade one of our proven drafted players for picks who will likely be complete busts.


100%. Fitt has been pretty average really. Of course, that gives us average results so…

The other issue is the Panthers the last 4 years or so have had FEWER overall picks than than any other team (I’ve seen that stat several times. Trying to find the source again).

Average draft performance but fewer picks is not a recipe for success.

I don’t mind getting rid of Fitt, but it’s pretty delusional to think we’re going to hire some first year GM who ends up being the 2nd coming of Howie Roseman.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tbe said:


100%. Fitt has been pretty average really. Of course, that gives us average results so…

The other issue is the Panthers the last 4 years or so have had FEWER overall picks than than any other team (I’ve seen that stat several times. Trying to find the source again).

Average draft performance but fewer picks is not a recipe for success.

I don’t mind getting rid of Fitt, but it’s pretty delusional to think we’re going to hire some first year GM who ends up being the 2nd coming of Howie Roseman.

Maybe if Fitterer would stop trading away draft picks like it's candy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

To further this, these are only good players. Not one all pro, barely a pro bowler.  

Tons of assets wasted on drafting athletic guys who cant play any fuging position. 

Not to mention all the picks that were traded away to field this garbage. 

 

But those ras scores tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tbe said:

Most draft picks are busts, based on a study of 1996-2016 draft picks. The results, which are based on the Pro Football Reference AV metric, are:

16.7% didn’t play for the team that drafted them

37% were considered useless. They either didn’t play much or didn’t make the team.

15.3% were considered poor. Had limited playing time and didn’t do well in the time they had.

10.5% were considered average. These are mediocre players that had starts or significant contributions over 2-3 years.

12.3% were considered good. These could be mediocre or average players that were multi-year starters, Pat Elflein or Christian Ponder for example, or perhaps some genuinely good players that didn’t last all that long for the team that drafted them- Sidney Rice for example. This is where the AV metric can over-rate a player based on the number of starts, rather than their performance while on the field.

6.9% were considered Great. This category is the first that includes undeniably good draft picks. In order to be considered great, they would’ve had to play for the team that drafted them into a second contract, and also performed well over those years.

1% were considered legendary. These are future Hall of Famers, multi-year All-Pros among the best in the league for most of their relatively long careers.

And so only about 8% of draft picks are players that really make much of a difference beyond replacement value, and only about 30% see much playing time or make a significant contribution to the team.

How Many of the 8% guys did we waste under Rivera. God our roster was good from 2012-2017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those numbers are spot on if you are evaluating the entire draft.  Rounds 1 through 3 should be spot on players that should still be around.  Corral, Marshall, Little and Grier are the only ones in the top 3 rounds that received the RED X.  

That doesn't say your list is wrong or anything but Rounds 4 through 7 are a crap shoot and projects.  Rounds 4 through 7 (19 Picks) we have only two that aren't a RED X.  That's horrendous.  If we don't start hitting on our later rounds we will be stuck in Mediocrity forever. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care about Fitterer because these results are pretty bad, but I know he is trying to please the new coaches, or listen to them when they say they really like a player or need a player. Then Rhule had roster control and I am going to go with, he actively demonstrated it at times. It is what I believe.

No one has earned anything though, in my eyes. Or hardly anyone has. I got no issues with job insecurity over there. They all should be working overtime to unfug this up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Half of 2022 is off the team. And two of those guys were trade ups. 5 picks that amounted to nothing in 1 year. 

There’s not a comparable draft around the league in that respect. Last year was crippling.

Patriots have also been drafting pretty bad sans a few like Duggar and Gonzo. They’re falling into a similar situation but comparability doesn’t make it excusable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That some folks are still clinging to not having enough information on Fitterer is honestly baffling. I wanted him to follow Rhule out the door but allowed that maybe he'd look a lot more competent without Rhule. Well... that hasn't happened.

He’s as bad at his job as Rhule was

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...