Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fowler rips Tepper


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, OldhamA said:

No problem with that piece (as someone with a Journalism degree).

Personally I wouldn't be calling out a vindictive billionaire, but more power to Fowler. 

my brother said the same thing, those dudes know people who know people who know people.  Not saying its violence but someone worth 22 billion can make life miserable through various channels for a damn columnist or anyone for that matter

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

my brother said the same thing, those dudes know people who know people who know people.  Not saying its violence but someone worth 22 billion can make life miserable through various channels for a damn columnist or anyone for that matter

It won't take all that.

He'll just right a check tomorrow and buy the Observer. Then sack Fowler. Then buy the next media outlet that hires Fowler. Then sack him again. On and on and on...all while spending the equivalent of couch cushion change.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I believe he said that frank told him at the combine who he liked or something to that effect.  

What? If Reich told a Colts beat writer who he liked at QB, knowing the Colts needed a QB and we had a pick 5 picks after, that is about the stupidest thing Reich can do. Hopefully, he was just blowing smoke. Again, we didn’t have the number 1 pick until a month after the combine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

No problem with that piece (as someone with a Journalism degree).

Personally I wouldn't be calling out a vindictive billionaire, but more power to Fowler. 

Real Journalism is a dying profession anyway. You really aren’t supposed to be a part of the story, but I guess in this day and age who cares. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

Technically, it used to. 

Yeah but I mean I guess he is right. In this day and age, in the era of clicks and tweets and like and publicity, it really doesn’t matter if some clown reporter makes it about himself. Me me me me is what’s it’s about now. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...