Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Athletic: Panthers Issues, Bryce, Reich, & More (Vid/Audio)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Bryce is a limited QB and always has been. I have no idea how these “experts” missed that.  

They used that stupid S2 test and convinced themselves that Bryce's intellect, which may be greater than average, makes up for his below average physical attributes. It's pretty impressive how that many experienced football guys all made the same mistake.

And as we can see from this video, Bryce's footwork isn't even all that great! I'm not sure he was ready enough to truly start, and I am not sure he can ever be a QB that can carry us to the playoffs or win a super bowl. 

If the entire team has to be perfect for him to succeed in then he isn't that special.

Edited by Daeavorn
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say, the impact on not being able to get on any sort of right track could cause many to really cut the team off.  

For me, the NBA transition to being a casual fan had a similar feel at this stage w/the Hornets.  

Annually, kept saying I wasn't going to continue watching but kept coming back.  Would put on the bigger games, but still follow them closely, get all bent out of shape or excited at FA/Draft moves. 

Eventually though, I've found 2-3 teams I enjoy rooting for, not as a heavy fan or anything, just enjoy watching (Kings, Pacers right now), and now, I barely even pay attention to what the Hornets are doing in the standings. Went from apathy/always coming back to truly just cutting it.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Bryce is a limited QB and always has been. I have no idea how these “experts” missed that.  

They all (the top 3 qbs) had equal measures of red flags and the idea that you give up your best player on the team to select just as much of a gamble at #1 as pick #3 is the most infuriating decisions of them all. Especially when you have all these qb whisperers on the team as we have.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team is run by 2 people who have no idea what they are doing or how the NFL even works and the rest are just going along with it. Take a crap job and that is on you. I don't feel for any of them and I hope they have a misrable time choking on their choices going forward.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thunderraiden said:

They all (the top 3 qbs) had equal measures of red flags and the idea that you give up your best player on the team to select just as much of a gamble at #1 as pick #3 is the most infuriating decisions of them all. Especially when you have all these qb whisperers on the team as we have.

Yeah I think that is one of the biggest gripes.

Fitterer kept mentioning if you're trading up it means you have conviction for your guy. But we wheeled right at the combine and kept trying to figure out who we wanted.  They traded while still evaluating and made the whole QB pro-day tour   

Just so much desperation--You don't give up that much when you can't decide who you want.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have no singular identity or unified vision.

They brought in people from diverse backgrounds, but no idea how to make it cohesive.

It's a failed experiment.

Sometimes these things take time to analyze and work out. Sometimes it's pretty damn obvious quickly. This is one of those instances where it only took a couple weeks to figure out this isn't going to work.

The only thing we figured out later on in the season is it doesn't matter who is calling the plays. We don't have an identity schematically and we don't have coaches or personnel that can overcome that.... despite throwing tons of capital into both of those parts.

Who is at fault? Ultimately the guy writing the checks. He has done nothing but make piss poor decisions and he shows no signs of improvement...only more ways to fug it all up.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

 

  • What we're doing offensively is just not making sense. The inside zone vs. spread conflict we've seen going on is true.  IMO, it's totally on coaching and Fitt.  Not the right personnel <-> scheme fit. We have the 2nd highest 11 personnel deployment in the league.  We're trying to run a Rams offense but without the pre-snap motion, bunch formations, no midirects, no typical bells and whistles.  Easy as hell to play defense against.  
  • No cohesive gameplan, no diverse route concepts, very bland and nothing scheme-worthy that would even get our receivers op


This is all just bad coaching. Frank needs to go. Anyone who couldn’t see it wasn’t working in camp or can’t figure out a way to fix it mid season shouldn’t have a job.

Bad ownership hires bad people.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...