Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper to speak on Tuesday


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, ncfan said:

From a friend of our now former QB coach 

IMG_7225.jpeg

I think most people are arguing the Tepper's were overly involved and held a level of sway over the staff.  Not that they directly made the pick and no one else felt BY was worthy of the pick. They certainly showed their preference in no uncertain terms at Young's pro day.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure nobody believes that it was Tepper versus everybody.

The idea that coaches preferred Stroud while scouts preferred Young and Tepper wound up tipping the balance isn't exactly farfetched though.

But those people were not quick to post that tweet since it doesn’t fit their agenda even though they are quick to post anything that does. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's kind of the point.

When you have a sh-tty organization, good players with better options will do exactly that.

Now, you can rage and lecture players about being spoiled and try to convince them that they should just suck it up and come work here rather than somewhere better because reasons, or you can actually try to make the organization better so that good players and coaches will want to come here.

I'll give you three guesses which of those options tends to be more effective...

I’m not raging  I’m not lecturing   

its not worth it to me  

The whole argument about ‘shitty organizations’ is also flawed but being the historian, you know this already as   Franchises can turn one way or the other very quickly 

Again, David Tepper is in control here.  His 2.2 billion dollar purchase price  earned him that right 

what I think of him, what you think of him or what you think he should do is of no consequence to this situation  or to him 

then again, you could send your recommendations directly to him.  Im  sure he would appreciate them 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

I think most people are arguing the Tepper's were overly involved and held a level of sway over the staff.  Not that they directly made the pick and no one else felt BY was worthy of the pick. They certainly showed their preference in no uncertain terms at Young's pro day.

Maybe, but if they felt like they couldn’t win with Bryce they’d have made a bigger objection and that’s something we know they did not do at that level.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, raleigh-panther said:

I’m not raging  I’m not lecturing   

its not worth it to me  

The whole argument about ‘shitty organizations’ is also flawed but being the historian, you know this already as   Franchises can turn one way or the other very quickly 

Again, David Tepper is in control here.  His 2.2 billion dollar purchase price  earned him that right 

what I think of him, what you think of him or what you think he should do is of no consequence to this situation  or to him 

then again, you could send your recommendations directly to him.  Im  sure he would appreciate them 

So we lowly fans should all just sit back and accept that our billionaire owner runs a sh-tty team and be happy that we're getting to watch football regardless of whether it's good or not?

Thanks for the suggestion, but I think I'll decline.

I don't think anybody here is of the mind that conversing on a message board is going to change anything, but it's what fans do in a sport talk forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Call Me James said:

Maybe, but if they felt like they couldn’t win with Bryce they’d have made a bigger objection and that’s something we know they did not do at that level.

Oh don't get me wrong I agree the front office and staff are rife with incompetence and buffoonery.

But at the same time we know from the mouth of David Tepper himself that he spoke to Bryce personally months before the draft and wanted him in process blue. At some point as an employee you reach an impasse where you see your boss who pays you wants a certain prospect more and you relent.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure nobody believes that it was Tepper versus everybody.

The idea that coaches preferred Stroud while scouts preferred Young and Tepper wound up tipping the balance isn't exactly farfetched though.

So you are going against what Kunkel and Jonathan Jones said, which is everyone in the building wanted Young.

There is so much to complain about regarding Tepper, but can you at least drop this BS narrative that you’ve been pushing over and over again. I

  • Flames 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, I watched and really didn't get anything out of it but more confusion.  It was said that you don't make a trade like they did without conviction for a player.  It was then said that the Panthers believed they were going to get pick number two and at that pick they would be getting CJ.  Are they admitting that the group had conviction on CJ but ended up taking Bryce as a big F.U. to the Texans?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mwa78 said:

So you are going against what Kunkel and Jonathan Jones said, which is everyone in the building wanted Young.

There is so much to complain about regarding Tepper, but can you at least drop this BS narrative that you’ve been pushing over and over again. I

It's far from a unanimous take, and that includes among trusted sources. You can also go back to the discussion that was had around draft time and see differences as well.

And if we're being both on a stand realistic, the notion that some wanted Stroud while others wanted young is a whole lot easier to believe then this idea that there was unanimous consensus Young was the best choice.

That kind of thing is pretty rare in football organizations.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Everyone? No one had another opinion or thought? No one? Since it’s not turning out, and the alternative appears to be, I’d think that’s very concerning isn’t it? 

Thats bullshit or people knew they didn’t have a choice anyways. I find it very difficult to believe the entire building unanimously came to the conclusion Tepper did.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...