Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CFB conference championship games

LinvilleGorge

By LinvilleGorge,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

GhostWhispah Rising Star

GhostWhispah

Posted
Posted
On 12/1/2023 at 6:19 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bo Nix 30 years old and still not the best QB in college football. That's tuff!

Bo Is the next Weeden, old farts who think they have potential NFL but are half way towards retiring when their rookie teammates can't relate to them. And what the heck does CFB stand for cause i don't know.

https://youtu.be/NTCXBAQDqv4?si=f1NjDV42EE_a4V8n

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted

The best teams are:

1. Washington

2. Oregon

3. Alabama 

4. Georgia 

5. Michigan

6. Texas(if they still had their QB they would be higher)

7. Ohio St.

After that it's a decent sized pool of relatively evenly matched teams.

 

The committee will have:

1. Michigan 

2. Washington

3. Florida State(shouldn't even be in the discussion at all, literally not a top 10 team)

4. Alabama(they can't help themselves)

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The best teams are:

1. Washington

2. Oregon

3. Alabama 

4. Georgia 

5. Michigan

6. Texas(if they still had their QB they would be higher)

7. Ohio St.

After that it's a decent sized pool of relatively evenly matched teams.

 

The committee will have:

1. Michigan 

2. Washington

3. Florida State(shouldn't even be in the discussion at all, literally not a top 10 team)

4. Alabama(they can't help themselves)

Texas lost their QB? I think you have them confused with FSU. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HardcoreHokie Mentor

HardcoreHokie

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The best teams are:

1. Washington

2. Oregon

3. Alabama 

4. Georgia 

5. Michigan

6. Texas(if they still had their QB they would be higher)

7. Ohio St.

After that it's a decent sized pool of relatively evenly matched teams.

 

The committee will have:

1. Michigan 

2. Washington

3. Florida State(shouldn't even be in the discussion at all, literally not a top 10 team)

4. Alabama(they can't help themselves)

Subjective “Best” is not who should make the final four.  Oregon has two losses when there are multiple undefeateds.

Undefeated Michigan out of the Top-4 is lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, HardcoreHokie said:

Subjective “Best” is not who should make the final four.  Oregon has two losses when there are multiple undefeateds.

Undefeated Michigan out of the Top-4 is lol.

I have said the entire year the Big Ten is a complete joke. I stand by that. It is only eclipsed by mid-G5 level ACC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

You might be right.  On the other hand, the backup qb who played against Florida and was starting to play well towards the end of the game might be the next Joe Montana, who is just starting to figure things out.  We don't know until they actually play.  

And he will be back for the playoff game.

FBS playoffs are a joke. 4 teams? FCS has a 24 team playoff every year and they survive.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HardcoreHokie Mentor

HardcoreHokie

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

I have said the entire year the Big Ten is a complete joke. I stand by that. It is only eclipsed by mid-G5 level ACC.

FSU beat Florida and LSU (with Heisman favorite Jayden Daniels) and is undefeated.

Alabama needed a Hail Mary last week to beat 6-6 Auburn.  

Auburn lost the week before to New Mexico State.  At home.  By three touchdowns.

SEC baby.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Leave our mark.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • frankw
      Delete this franchise

      By frankw · Posted

      It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...