Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Michael Pittman/Zach Moss/ Anthony Richardson/ Jonathan Taylor.... NO PROBLEM for Steichen


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TheBigKat said:

NEVER in my life have I seen someone who made so much money but yet so clueless.... As big of the miss CJ was at QB, missing Steichen is going to set us back further

 

This guy is handedly COACH of the YEAR, cooking with backups and 3rd stringers....

 

Look at the Colts offense when they dumped Frank Melatonin Reich and picked up Reich

 

 

IMG_4564.jpg

godalmighty there are a lot of brutal takes in that thread.    There are some posters that need to do some massive mea culpa in here. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

Almost every coach we passed on is doing well right now. Except the one we hired and the one we interviewed twice (Moore). Sheesh Tepper sucks. 

You attract what you are. Every single process (which is all of them) involving Tepper's input has lead to failure. Had we done even just ONE thing the opposite of what Tepper wanted, we would be in a way better spot right now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Yeh, because we know after one season who the good and bad Qb’s are… 

Your logic would be sound if it weren't for Andre Ware, Jamarcus Russell, Matt Leinart, Zach Wilson, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Johnny Manziel, Vince Young, Heath Shuler, Trey Lance, etc.

Sometimes you just know from the get go.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

NEVER in my life have I seen someone who made so much money but yet so clueless.... As big of the miss CJ was at QB, missing Steichen is going to set us back further

 

This guy is handedly COACH of the YEAR, cooking with backups and 3rd stringers....

 

Look at the Colts offense when they dumped Frank Melatonin Reich and picked up Reich

 

 

IMG_4564.jpg

Yes

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Your logic would be sound if it weren't for Andre Ware, Jamarcus Russell, Matt Leinart, Zach Wilson, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Johnny Manziel, Vince Young, Heath Shuler, Trey Lance, etc.

Sometimes you just know from the get go.

I would be more hopeful and patient with Bryce if he was a physical specimen like a Cam or Josh Allen. Dude is a 5'9 180 lbs QB with a weak arm, where is the potential?

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I would be more hopeful and patient with Bryce if he was a physical specimen like a Cam or Josh Allen. Dude is a 5'9 180 lbs QB with a weak arm, where is the potential?

my former HIGH SCHOOL has QBs who are a bigger physical specimen than Young

5
 
QB • Jr. • 6' 2" • 194 lbs
5
 
QB, FS • Sr. • 6' 1" • 180 lbs

 

 

HIGH SCHOOL

https://www.maxpreps.com/nc/charlotte/myers-park-mustangs/football/roster/

 

unfortunately they don't have middle school and elementary school rosters to compare Young's measurable to

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...