Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetically- if we did win out


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yea I mean probably not. But it would at least be a discussion I think. i also think Brown is doing a better job with the playcalling than hes being given credit for. Our run game is way better now and we are scheming guys open better. 

Edited by Frank9999
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point maybe Tepper should have a hot dog eating contest amongst the remaining coaches. The coach who eats the most hot dogs can be the interim head coach next game. There will be one extreme hot dog eating contest with a no double dogging rule for the full time head coaching job in the offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frank9999 said:

Yea I mean probably not. But it would at least be a discussion I think. i also think Brown is doing a better job with the playcalling than hes being given credit for. Our run game is way better now and we are scheming guys open better. 

Thomas Brown's situational play calling overall has been horrific in the majority of games post Frank.  The only one you can't bash him for was yesterday's rain game.  And the one time we got down to the goal (a situation he has been bad at redzone/short yardage/need to pick it up).....Tabor's FG play took it all away from him.  His best game as an OC we scored 9 points. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

Thomas Brown's situational play calling overall has been horrific in the majority of games post Frank.  The only one you can't bash him for was yesterday's rain game.  And the one time we got down to the goal (a situation he has been bad at redzone/short yardage/need to pick it up).....Tabor's FG play took it all away from him.  His best game as an OC we scored 9 points. 

Like always though plays were there, Thielen flat out dropped a ball on the one yard line 🤷‍♂️

there have been some suspect short yardage calls but i think hes improved the offense by actually creating a run game 

Edited by Frank9999
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...