Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SB50 Levels of Bad Officiating


SteveSmithTD89
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, CWalker4205 said:

Damn, the refs were against us from the coin toss! Alexander made the choice for defense instead of defer and the ref said “you sure about that?” And let him change his mind. fug the nfl and fug the script 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39179795/green-bay-packers-overcome-mistake-coin-toss-win

I can't stand NFL refs. They are some of the biggest trash bags in pro sports. I see signs every season that the NFL is attempted to be fixed to a degree and it's pathetic. I would love to see some major evidence proven and some of those involves sent to prison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I’m wrong but GB shouldn’t have been able to challenge the catch, fumble, and fumble recovery as “not being a completed pass” because the turnover and recovery that was called on the field nullified it “not being a catch.” Hope that made sense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL Referees Association gained so much leverage in 2012 with how bad the replacement referees preformed. In a perfect world referees would be able to be held accountable for poor performances such as being forced to not officiate for a certain number of weeks and or being fined for multiple obvious missed or bad calls in a game. It's awful how the NFL will suspend and fine players for some of the most minimal actions that have no effect on the outcome of a game but will allow referees to blatantly miss and or make wrong and bad calls that change the outcomes of games and have no accountability system in place. Players and coaches can't even question the decision of a referee in the media without being fined or suspended. I fully expect Adam Thielen to be fined for his comments after game, but we will see no punishment for the blatant Packer biased referees. NFL referees operate with complete and udder impunity and if I was the president of the NFLPA I would push for a referee accountability system in the next CBA. 

Edited by CmC2k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...