Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the wide receivers magically get good?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, frankw said:

Fair or not at the end of the day the offense goes as the QB goes. Bryce was dialed in and that translated to rest of the offense.

As bad as people are saying GB's defense is. The Bucs are somehow worse. No reason we can't replicate this performance next week. Against Baker Mayfield too? Cmon...

2 weeks. Got the Jags up next (If BY9 out plays TLaw it's gonna be awesome)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running the ball well.

Cad Mays has been very solid the last few games at LG.

Gabe Jackson at RG (should have started instead of Nash who got beat bad twice to start the game)

Threat of run + better blocking gives Bryce time.

We had a hot answer for the blitz.

Notice how often Bryce extended the play and then straight up made play.

Notice how often we have stacked set and MOTION!!!!

It's a lot of things but the huge difference is play at guard and the running game.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

It was really just Chark who stepped up. Thielen has been solid all season. I would love to see some big renaissance from our receiving corps but we’ll have to wait and see. We’ve seen Chark drop some easy balls this year so I think he’s prone to streakiness and this was good Chark…really good, even.

And Tremble.  Of course, he is a TE, but he did make some nice plays.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...