Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What coach(s) would actually make you happy with the hire

MGH1989

By MGH1989,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, BrianS said:

This next coaching hire doesn't matter.  He'll be here a season and a half, tied to Bryce.  When BY is a clear failure they'll ditch this coach and draft a QB again.

Sorry.  I wish I could see it differently, but I don't.

1 and done again if it's still 'all in on Bryce' and not 'hope we can turn Bryce around'. One is going to be another #1 pick with more of the same and the other is going to be Payton in Denver getting what they really want after 1 year of laying their foundation and biding their time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thennek Experienced

thennek

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, BrianS said:

This next coaching hire doesn't matter.  He'll be here a season and a half, tied to Bryce.  When BY is a clear failure they'll ditch this coach and draft a QB again.

Sorry.  I wish I could see it differently, but I don't.

Three coaches have already been fired due to BY. When Frank was fired there were rumors that several coaches wanted to bench BY and play Dalton. I think we know which coaches wanted to do that…..

As long as Tepper continues to influence and meddle football decisions the Panthers will continue to be a doormat. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TarHeel69 Community Regular

TarHeel69

Posted
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Lol, you think Tepper is going to have dudes tell him how to run this organization?  I mean, he SHOULD, but billionaires don't tend follow the directives of other people unless it's within their own circle.

If the organization was smart, they would have a mole to get to Nicole ear and thereby Dave's.  Nicole is about the only person I think that can persuade/dissuade his stubborn arse.  So getting David to change his ways isn't the objective, but a confidant with some real NFL knowledge that can get Nicole's ear regularly to pass along to her hubby.

No, I don't believe Tepper is going to change his MO, but we can all dream a little dream. 

Edited by TarHeel69
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean, maybe, just maybe….Goff just isn’t a bad QB.  He was a multi pro bowl QB that went to the SB.  People claimed that was just McVay being McVay.  Now he is a pro bowl QB again….and everyone claims it’s Ben Johnson. 

You could be right, my only thing is, I can’t see McVay parting with him if he was the guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted

My Top-3:

Ben Johnson

Dave Canales

Mike MacDonald

 

Who I'd be fine with:

Shane Waldron

Ben Slowick (seems a bit inexperienced but am open to it given HOU's year)

Frank Smith (again, a bit unsure given his resume but open)

Jim Harbaugh (why not if him and Tepper end up figuring it out haha)

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
razorwolf Collaborator

razorwolf

Posted
Posted

I’ve posted this several places!

Coaches:

Ben Johnson (Lions)-OC

Dan Quinn (Cowboys)-DC

Mike Macdonald (Ravens)-DC

Brian Johnson (Eagles)-OC

Bobby Slowik (Texans)-OC

Rich Bisaccia (Packers)-AHC/STC

Todd Monken (Ravens)-OC

Olive branch Candidate: Steve Wilks (49ers)-DC

GM Candidates:

Adam Peters (Will never leave 49ers)

Marvin Allen (Dolphins)

Ray Agnew (Lions)

Will McClay (Cowboys)

Trent Kirchner (Seahawks)

Joe Hortiz (Ravens)

Alec Halaby or Brandon Hunt (Eagles)

Glenn Cook (Browns)

Ed Dodds (Colts)

Andy Weidl (Steelers)

Ian Cunningham (Bears)

James Liipfert (Texans)

Dan Morgan jr. (Panthers) or Adrian Wilson

**A real team: Team President**

Possible Executives: (Take Samir Suieman); Has proven he CAN’t be Team President 

Pat Moriatry (Ravens)

Brandt Tilis (Chiefs)

Rob Brzezinski (Viks)

Russ Ball (Packers)

Catherine Raiche (don’t think I’ll find many to agree!)(Browns)

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
John P. Newbie

John P.

Posted
Posted

 

As a PSL owner from day 1 I have been a passionate fan for the entire time until midway through the 1st Tepper year. That's all it took for me to realize this was going to become the absolute poo show it has become. End of the season I sold my PSL's and after 27 years I was done. The following attributes are not consistent with an NFL owner that can possibly be successful. Controlling, self centered megalomaniac that doesn't play well with others that thinks BECAUSE he can make money in the stock market, he can run a sports franchise. Major difference is the stock market doesn't require human interaction but dealing with a sports franchise does. 

So to all the PSL OWNERS/FANS, my wish for you is nothing but the best and a new franchise owner in the very near future. 

John P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...