Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We thought Fitterer was promising at one time. 

I just can't get too excited until the next GM is hired, and, more importantly, I see some work. Until then, all the promise is just theory at best or speculation at worst. 

Oh I'm definitely not going to build up any expectations.  No use wasting extra energy...but at least this gives us reprieve to think we did something good before we suck again haha.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After some research on Champ Kelly, I think I would pass. 

Guy recommended some horrible signings as Bears Director of Pro Scouting. You can go look but Garry Williams, Amini Silatolu, and Nate Chandler were 3 of them. (If you guys remember them)

Bears had a 48-65 record in his time their in Director of Pro Scouting and Asst. Director of Player Personnel. 

Hell, he has a 14-20 record as AGM for the Raiders the last two years and their 7th overall pick is heading in the bust direction.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah.  Both seem promising. 

Not that I know they're specific roles but with Dodds - I've really liked the Colts last 2 draft classes.  Was a BIG JuJu Brents and Downs fan.  And the Raiders finally had a decent draft last year after enough separation from that strange Mayock/Gruden era.

I remember some of my research regarding Dodds during the last cycle. The thing that stuck out the most was that he insisted on absolute control, no interference from anybody.

Wasn't hard to figure out why he declined the chance to work with Matt Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Oh I'm definitely not going to build up any expectations.  No use wasting extra energy...but at least this gives us reprieve to think we did something good before we suck again haha.  

I think that the next hires may tell the story. If we wire a GM and HC that's worth a damn, we'll likely get back to competitive football. If not, we may just become the newest iteration of the Jets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...