Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want a Dan Campbell (leader of men) or Mike McDaniel (idiot savant) style of coach?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s becoming more and more apparent there’s two types of coaches in the NFL

 

Leader of men:

Campbell, Tomlin, Harbaugh, Ryan, Pierce, Vrabel

Idiot savants X’ and O’s type:

Mcdaniel, O’Connell, Shanahan, McVay, LaFleur

Personally I think the NFL is moving towards the idiot savant style coaches who rely on the roster to be made of players that execute their gameplan. But when the tough gets going these coaches don’t have that grit ability to get the max out of their players, they and their team fold (McDaniels and Dolphins easily come to mind).

 

With where this franchise is at right now with personnel, I’d say this franchise needs more of a leader of men style coach then a X’s and O’s tactician which is why we won’t get a Ben Johnson style of coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the coach. All of them have positives and negatives. McDaniels' negative is his immaturity. I don't know how that plays out long term because it can improve even with his base personality.

I'll take a caoch that can adapt and change over time because when they stop trying it's a sign that their time is up. McDaniels might need a Reid type move next to help him take that step so Miami might not be getting the best of him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I want someone who wins.

Honestly don't give a rat's ass whether they do so while acting like John Wayne or Jerry Lewis.

I totally agree, just need a coach that will produce.
 

Funny though, the millennials and Gen Z’s are thinking who the f___ is this John Wayne and Jerry Lewis. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...