Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales Hire Temperature Gauge


Ricky Spanish
 Share

How do you feel about the Canales Hire?  

370 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about the Canales Hire?

    • Love it!
      120
    • Hate it!
      28
    • Indifferent
      220


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

So he changed.  That's promising.  Maybe he will keep changing/adapting?

The  "change" I want to see from Tepper is him butting his ass out 

Canales doesn't really strike me as having the leverage to do that unless Morgan backs him.

We'll have to see if that happens.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The  "change" I want to see from Tepper is him butting his ass out 

Canales doesn't really strike me as having the leverage to do that unless Morgan backs him.

We'll have to see if that happens.

Dan Morgan will stop Tepper from crossing the LOS. It’s his specialty. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Dan Morgan will stop Tepper from crossing the LOS. It’s his specialty. 

I genuinely hope so.

Mind you, Dan will still have to prove he knows what he's doing too.

What scares me is I remember him advocating for the Panthers to sign Michael Vick back in the day.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

Glad we have a coach with  potential  at this point.

Let's get to work.

The Morgan hire is more the issue right now.

Why is Morgan the bigger issue? Experience? He and Canales worked together for years in Seattle. This hire was Morgan-led, so if your mindset is that Morgan is a puppet for Tepper ... so is Canales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading through this thread looks exactly like it did when we hired Rhule due to his youth, and then again when we hired Reich due to his experience. This guy will also poo the bed and I imagine the thread when he gets fired (O/U is at 25 games and I’ll take the under) will also look just like the Rhule/Reich fired threads. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Montsta said:

Reading through this thread looks exactly like it did when we hired Rhule due to his youth, and then again when we hired Reich due to his experience. This guy will also poo the bed and I imagine the thread when he gets fired (O/U is at 25 games and I’ll take the under) will also look just like the Rhule/Reich fired threads. 

Sadly it doesn't matter if we lose  every game this dude is likely our HC for the next 2 years at least.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Morgan got his guy. Perhaps we should all rejoice. 

We can at least fool ourselves into thinking that Morgan told Tepper--who we all know wanted Johnson--to effectively "put a sock in it."

yeah this is a good sign that Morgan is running the show. Not the biggest fan of keeping him considering how bad the team he's had a large hand in building has been but at least we likely finally have a HC hired by a GM so they are both on the same page and have the same vision of the team. The Hurney/Rhule/Fitterer/Reich situations were all so completely out of sync.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...