Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Introductory Press Conference


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, jamos14 said:

He definitely ripped the attitude of this past years team.    Turnover going to be high over next 24 months and we need it.

I hope he sets the example by trading Burns.   Everybody knows that even the "star" will be gone if they don't toughen up.

Remains to be seen but there were plenty of opportunities to mention Burns as an example if they planned on giving him the mega contract he's looking for.  I'd guess he's gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

I said the same thing.  Nothing has changed regardless of the bs Tepper spouts.  Mr and Ms Tepper are in charge.

yeah, everyone this time of year is going to say exactly what folks want to here.  They know what you want to here.  They say it. 

I mean, who here doesn't want this offense....

It's going to be innovative, it's going to be creative. We will always be working to get better. And then we're going to do it the right way – on and off the field.

you have to get the ball vertical down the field. You have to get chunk plays. All the statistics, all the analytics . . . that’s one of the reasons why I’m excited to work for Mr. Tepper

sounds good.  Sounds like what we are starving for.  That's what the last guy told us was coming lol.  It's all a sales job.  Morgan playing to us about the old Panthers is too.   Like somehow he wasn't part of what was been being built prior to him getting promoted. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...