Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Diggs a possibility?


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Cary Kollins said:

 


I see people say it both ways commonly. I stand corrected! @LinvilleGorge please continue using that saying as you wish

I always saw it like this .

 

the right side - 30 -  the wrong side 

 

Anything under 30 is the right side of 30. Anything over is the wrong side. It generally means you are older and your best years are behind you. 
 

But to the point I still don’t agree with Linvilles assessment of Diggs. Mike Evans is 30 and still produces at a high level. We let go of a 30+ year old Steve Smith and he had a 1000 yard plus season in Baltimore. 
 

I think Diggs still has solid years ahead of him. I just don’t think the team pairing makes the most sense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

 
lol you don’t understand the saying and that’s ok

 

If you mean to say 30 is old, just say he’s 30. “The wrong side of” an age means they are on the second half or nearing the end of that age…like 36,37,38,39 are on the wrong side of 30.

 

a 29 year old isn’t “on the right” side of 30


might save you embarrassment at a party or something if you’re going to attempt that saying 

No it doesn't. 

He's over 30, i.e. "the wrong side of that age". It's a young man's sport. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2024 at 11:40 AM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Here we go again passing up on elite WR's because of age of attitude.

 

Classic Huddle!

 

 

And people wonder why we suck. We keep passing up elite players. It's a shame some people only care about stuff off the field. If you want Bryce to get better go get him some damn weapons. We are in no position to be picky. Cmon guys stop with the nonsense every single year.

We are in a position to be picky, as in we need to pick up a guy or two in the draft. Getting aging WRs who are on a noticeable decline don't move the needle for me. At least Higgins or maybe even DK (if they put him up for trade) are still at the peak of their super powers.

 

There's no way Diggs is coming here anyway. He's not on the same side of the curve as a younger receiver, he wants to win now.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't get him. Kind of seemed a bit of a douche in Buffalo and I don't think Bryce Young is strong enough or tough enough if a leader to deal with his BS. If it were a guy like Cam, he would put him in his place when he acted out but Bryce doesn't seem like an aggressive get in the players faces type leader unfortunately. I think Diggs would cause a ton of trouble is Bryce struggles next season again to push the ball down field and complete significant passes. Bryce does not need Diggs attitude in what should be his next and last season to prove himself worthy of being the QB face of the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diggs seems more of a throwback to the diva era.  I mean, if he has an issue w/ Josh Allen and the best window of his career.....he would have BIG problems here.  Pretty sure Diggs has always been a grumpy WR with his QBs.  Same w/ Cousins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...