In a deep qb class should the panther take one day 3?

[SmokinwithWilly]

The goal should always be developing talent and improving the roster. If there's a QB that we think could develop into a solid backup or potential starter, we need to be looking at him. Every player is 1 hit from their career being over. It's foolish to just assume that Bryce, CJ or AR don't fall into that category just because they're young. 

[ForJimmy]

Even if we had Prime Cam, I wouldn’t be against a day 3 project QB assuming one we were high on is there. 

[ForJimmy]

I kind of like Jordan Travis out of the later round guys. Hell the Lions just took Hooker later in the draft because of the value knowing he could sit and recover from his injury. 

[chbright]

Eh, maaaaybe but it currently this doesn't look like a stellar mid/back of the draft class.

Austin Reed and, if I squint, Kurtis Rourke are the only ones that fit the bill. Smaller school, good numbers early and throughout  career. Neither are some super duper 24 pushing 25 year old guy either. Reeds my guy this cycle for finding the overlooked QB.

 

I was ok with Milton, but unless somehow he morphs way more than tyrod or Allen, he's a switch to another position guy. I'm off his bandwagon completely now 

Don't see tuga being the next Purdy. Pratt is a long shot. I know he's the sleeper of the class for some. But the senior bowl wasn't the breakout he and the draftniks expected.

[MHS831]

We will get 2 players in this draft if we are lucky.  This is going to sound crazy, but I see WR and a CB on day 2. 

On day 3, BPA all the way.  In my mocks, there are a lot of DTs, WRs, and QBs who could tempt Morgan. 

 

[Jackie Lee]

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think so. We just drafted the wrong guy.

Well yeah if you're considering CJ he's like basically a top 10 qb already. Just saying the roster wasn't exactly playoff ready minus a qb like Fitt was making it out to be in his pressers

[BrisbanePanther]

No, they should not unless they have one at the top of their board, and they should only have one there after they've addresses all of the holes in the team's talent and depth. Even Hekker got a scary hit to the knee, and he was the team's best player this year.

If Bryce plays again like he did this year, throwing in a 5th round QB in week 13 or 14 "to see what he has" does nothing for the team but set up the back-up QB off-season competition between he and Bryce after the #1 pick in '25. 

The odds are greater for Day 3 picks to make impact elsewhere on the field. Picking your future backup should not be a draft priority.

[Johnstonny]

Sure as long as we don't trade up and his name isn't Matt Corral..

[Johnstonny]

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

@Wolfcop poo all you want but to still be clinging to the belief that Bryce was still the right guy to pick is just absolute delusion.

@Wolfcop post disgusts me...but he/she has a right to an opinion....

Edited February 10 by Johnstonny

[LinvilleGorge]

10 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

@Wolfcop post disgusts me...but he/she has a right to an opinion....

So he should state it.

 

[Johnstonny]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So he should state it.

 

he or she...

[Crixtala]

as bad as this roster is currently, nearly every pick should be BPA. If that ends up being a qb in a later round, so be it. but if bryce shits the bed next season, we should be picking early in '25 and grabbing a high, 1st round qb

i'd rather see the draft capital spent filling other holes this year 

[Ricky Prickles]

1 hour ago, Johnstonny said:

he or she...

99.9% of the posters on the board are male so it was probably a pretty safe assumption there as them being a male.

[weyco2000]

4 hours ago, csx said:

Why wouldn't he? He's "allowed" throwing resources at QB every single year since 2020. Too much hax been one of the biggest problems. A later round puck would be the least wasteful things he's "allowed "

A later round “puck” might be “allowed”?