Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In a deep qb class should the panther take one day 3?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MechaZain said:

I don't like our odds of drafting a QB who will make an impact on day 3. Not when there are so many needs we could more easily address with that pick. 

The 1st pick in 2025 is what's TBD. Bryce is either going to make us competitive next year or put us in the spot to draft his replacement.

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

No to picking a QB. Worry about developing the young QB they already have on the roster instead of another one plus Young. There's too many holes on the roster and too few draft picks. Use the picks to improve the overall quality of the rest of the roster, especially since they're going with Young anyway.

The very reason why this draft is going to suck for me personally. I don't disagree with  one thing you stated, but it's not what I want or would do given the chance to make that decision.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

either we spend this year focusing one putting all the needed pieces around BY for him to succeed, or we have the team ready for the next guy. 

but this year is all about surrounding the QB, not switching out the QB.

It's about a pipeline.  The one thing we NEVER learn as an organization.  That pipeline only stops when you have your perennial Pro Bowl, All-Pro or Future HOF locked down for the next 10 years.  Until then, waiting for the current guy to completely flame out (or trade or bolt in FA) and THEN trying to replace him is why we are in this endless cycle of misery.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All teams should absolutely take a flyer on a late-round QB if they think the value is there. Those picks are dart throws anyway and what better score than to find a quality QB, even if just as a backup, that late in the draft.

Edited by KSpan
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KSpan said:

All teams should absolutely take a flyer on a late-round QB if they think the value is there. Those picks are dart throws anyway and what better score than to find a quality QB, even if just as a backup, that late in the draft.

Seems to work for Green Bay who never gets stuck be in QB purgatory.  The Panthers will never learn.  Say what you will about Purdy, but that was a total flyer pick when the 49ers did not need a QB.  Revisionist history may say otherwise, but at that time they did not.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Seems to work for Green Bay who never gets stuck be in QB purgatory.  The Panthers will never learn.  Say what you will about Purdy, but that was a total flyer pick when the 49ers did not need a QB.  Revisionist history may say otherwise, but at that time they did not.

The only reason purdy wasnt cut and got reps was because Jimmy G was hurt.  Once they saw him in practice then they knew if push came to shove he would do.  If jimmy go was getting the second team reps purdy is probably cut.  Crazy how things work out

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I would not draft any QB this draft. Let Bryce either get it and become something good or lead us to a high draft pick so we can draft his replacement next season.

Problem being Penix and Nix would be vying for QB1 in next year's class.  Ewers would be QB3.  See the tragic irony there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
    • I hate Marchand, but if he became a free agent.....
×
×
  • Create New...