Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I've seen enough of 'Dawg" Morgan, he is a bonafide idiot and Tepper got his bootlicker


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He is a 26 year old top OG and he got top market day 1 of FA. He also fills a HUGE (pun intended) need. It all makes sense. 

After spending heavy on molding the team for young and come week 7 he isn't the guy, what then? Ugh.....

Hunt is massive and can move great, but in my opinion he isn't worth resetting the market like Dan did. Now is Cobertt cut? moved to C? traded? He's coming off 2 knee injuries, but around 8 million. 

This move is similar if they signed another RB on my "wow' scale. 

I thought the goal was to get better overall? Somehow they got worse following all these moves.... Less talented for sure*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

After spending heavy on molding the team for young and come week 7 he isn't the guy, what then? Ugh.....

Hunt is massive and can move great, but in my opinion he isn't worth resetting the market like Dan did. Now is Cobertt cut? moved to C? traded? He's coming off 2 knee injuries, but around 8 million. 

This move is similar if they signed another RB on my "wow' scale. 

I thought the goal was to get better overall? Somehow they got worse following all these moves.... Less talented for sure*

Hunt is a need for whoever is QB next year as well. The Eagles already reset the market with Dickinson. Hunt is a top 5 RG at 26 years old and got paid top dollar on day 1 of FA. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

Now is also not later.  No way to actually say we couldn’t have got better compensation later for Burns.  Burns was literally dealt the first moment he could be.  It was cheap compensation.  I would have sat on him.  If it killed the NY deal so be it.   FO is working in reverse we overpay when we acquire like Darnold, CJ, etc and get lousy picks when we deal away guys 

I agree, now is now. Something better may have been coming over the horizon, I think its a fair point. Hopefully the FO has an idea of the market, it definitely wasn't two 1st per OP.

Bird in the hand and all that aside, I think moving him was necessary for the cap implications and I’m really not sure he wanted to be here, and that is vital to the culture.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't understand how people are stuck on this.  Burns isnt an "elite pass rusher" he is a good pass rusher and a liability against the run.  NFL teams know this, thats why this offer was the most compensation we could get for the money he wanted.  People are acting like other teams were offering two firsts and we just decided to take the giants offer instead.  This was clearly the best offer we received. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

Poo reactionary thread is poo. 

People on this board have been clamoring for a rebuild, instead of a half-in/half-out team building, for the past 3-4 years. When Morgan steps in and starts the process of a true rebuild, people bitch and moan. Classic Huddle for ya. 

Rebuilding with a starting talent level of less than a expansion team is going to be difficult. At some point the 'rebuild' becomes a cycle and you're the new Jaguars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Rebuilding with a starting talent level of less than an expansion team is going to be difficult. At some point the 'rebuild' becomes a cycle and you're the new Jaguars.

Yeah. You can’t just say, “We’re rebuilding” and it happen exactly like you want. The team has to have a plan. Maybe they have one. Maybe they don’t. Either way, a rebuild doesn’t start with giving Burns $30M a year going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Rebuilding with a starting talent level of less than a expansion team is going to be difficult. At some point the 'rebuild' becomes a cycle and you're the new Jaguars.

Maybe wait past day 1 of free agency to analyze a rebuild 

 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...