Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With the 33rd Pick in the NFL Draft


Recommended Posts

The offers: 

A 2025 First... Hell Yes. Thing is.... we have about a 10-30 percent chance of this scenario happening. 

The more probable option would resemble something like the Cards who traded #33 last year and got: 

#41, #72 and a '24 3rd from the Titans who took Levis at 33. 

**The trade included #33 and #81 for #41, #72 and a future 3rd**

I'm not a fan of that haul. But being at 39 does give us some playroom. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ColumbusCounty said:

The offers: 

A 2025 First... Hell Yes. Thing is.... we have about a 10-30 percent chance of this scenario happening. 

The more probable option would resemble something like the Cards who traded #33 last year and got: 

#41, #72 and a '24 3rd from the Titans who took Levis at 33. 

**The trade included #33 and #81 for #41, #72 and a future 3rd**

I'm not a fan of that haul. But being at 39 does give us some playroom. 

Yea I'd rather pick 33, I think one of our goals should be not to emulate the Cardinals

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

This pick is usually a very hot commodity and often traded. 

We are not ready to contend in 2024.

I would very much consider taking a 2025 1st round pick for this draft choice.   We will certainly get offers from other teams.  

Would you take a 1st in 2025 for #33 and maybe a late rounder pick in 2024.  

Plus, with such a deep WR class we would certainly still be able to pick a quality WR. 

I dunno, trading away the pick until next year my conflict in what ever BS they told the free agents to get them to sign here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're right. And he's been on the upswing, something that's been a long time coming. And over the last few years, we woulda been better with a Trent Dilfer out there considering everything.  But right now, we got a W following a W the week before. It has been a while since we've been there. And we're at .500. I know that's only a C grade right now, but man, after so many F grades in a row... it's kinda refreshing to be here. Is Bryce a long term answer here? He's still got a long way to go. Could he do it? Those three touchdown passes he made were bang on, high performance throws. And they finally game planned him pushing the ball down field. It was against a weak Dallas defense, but at least they were running a game based on attacking weaknesses of the defense rather than covering the weaknesses of our own team. Maybe both Canales and Young are maturing before our eyes.
    • No, he got beat at home by Michigan this year.  The other five wins are against Big Ten and Non-Power bottom feeders.  He's 0-7 vs ranked teams, and each year Nebraska has started strong and then faded in conference play.  Nebraska is 1-7 in two Novembers under Rhule.  This year their November slate is USC, @UCLA, @Penn State and Iowa.  Very possible they lose all of those games.  His tenure at Nebraska is looking very Baylor-esque.  And somehow he's still a front runner for the Penn State job.  Which would be ironic since they just ran a very Matt Rhule like (as far as can't beat any good teams) James Franklin out of town. 
    • GWDs vs... HOU: 15 - 13, no turnovers ATL: 9 - 7, no turnovers NO: 23 - 22, 1 interception NYG: 20 - 17, no turnovers ARI: 36 - 30, no turnovers @ATL: 44 - 38, no turnovers MIA: 27 - 24, 1 interception + 1 fumble DAL: 30 - 27, 1 interception (that was clearly TMac's fault) Which one of those games was Bryce clearly the reason that the team was behind aside from Miami?
×
×
  • Create New...