Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

🚨Tony Pauline: Panthers interested in CB Mike Sainristril @33

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I have seen him in mocks around rounds 3-4.  I was a bit surprised he was that low.  I hear a lot of teams like him.  I don't like him at 33 or 39--CB rich draft.  be patient.  I figured we go WR and LB in round 2--after a trade back.

Juan, thanks for bringing us stuff like this when it is slow. 

He's been pretty consistently top 40 on PFF this offseason (currently #34).  #43 overall for Brugler.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

He's been pretty consistently top 40 on PFF this offseason.  #43 overall for Brugler.

it really does matter where you do your practice mocks.  I have some that have Elliss (OLB, Utah, I think) at 150.  He will go in round 2 imo. 

I am starting to get pumped about this....just ready to know what he have.  I am looking at this as year 1 or a 2 year rebuild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted

Played 22% outside, 151 snaps of 684, but played one of the highest % of MI defensive snaps. 

What's a given is that he played a lot in Michigans's 4-2-5 with diverse assignments--which people saying he's slot exclusive or nickel aren't really considering the responsibilities for his potential role in the Fangio-hybrid penny package we run...this kid would get used 90%+ of snaps easily.  

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

it really does matter where you do your practice mocks.  I have some that have Elliss (OLB, Utah, I think) at 150.  He will go in round 2 imo. 

I am starting to get pumped about this....just ready to know what he have.  I am looking at this as year 1 or a 2 year rebuild. 

I'm looking at it like we suck and will still suck.  But maybe we get a good player or two.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CmC2k Mentor

CmC2k

Posted
Posted

Dude's a great player. The more I watch and read about him the more I like him and want him on the team. I feel like he'll be a great fit with the DAWG culture Morgan wants to build. I imagine Evero is having wet dreams about having Horn and hopefully if we can convince him to come back Stephon Gilmore playing on the outside with Sainristil playing the slot and moving around the secondary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

The good news is that the Panthers have plenty of holes and a dearth of talent!  I don't think you can point to a spot and say "we're set there" outside of guard maybe.  

I'd love to get several of these dawgs on the team to help transform the culture.  It may not lead to a 10 in season this year, but is we're able to reset the roster and attitude...  It won't hurt my feelings.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
XClown1986 Proficient

XClown1986

Posted
Posted

He reminds me of Lamarcus Joyner coming out. He is a tough evaluation because on the one hand, he was super productive, but on the other, he lacks any standout translatable traits for his position.

He's a tough, smart player, and he will likely get playing time for whoever drafts him, but it is hard to justify drafting a role/gadget player earlier than late round 2 or round 3. He's a nickel that can dabble at free safety. But he lacks length for corner, and the bulk for safety. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, XClown1986 said:

He reminds me of Lamarcus Joyner coming out. He is a tough evaluation because on the one hand, he was super productive, but on the other, he lacks any standout translatable traits for his position.

He's a tough, smart player, and he will likely get playing time for whoever drafts him, but it is hard to justify drafting a role/gadget player earlier than late round 2 or round 3. He's a nickel that can dabble at free safety. But he lacks length for corner, and the bulk for safety. 

I think that's all very fair to consider.

Decent comp. 

I'd say there's shades of Devin McCourty who ended up converting to FS but had some good years at CB.  For his best case? - no doubt easy ones to point to would be Anton Winfield or Asante Samuel.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...