Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets footage on the trade back from 65

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Honestly, I doubt it. That franchise seems pretty emotionless about trading away 1st and 2nd round picks. It's quite the anomaly.

people were talking about how excited McVay probably was at getting a first round pick this year and i think he was probably like...

As If No GIF by Desus & Mero

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Liminy Collaborator

Liminy

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Interesting that we initiated that trade, we called them

Probably knew our spot wasn't as enticing when they were looking for interest earlier, so once it got to a certain point and no trade had been announced, you have a tiny bit of leverage I would think that they feel they are running out of options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
On 5/1/2024 at 5:51 PM, Basbear said:

Dan must have truly wanted to draft around the 150 area in the 5th. Seems he traded for dang near all the picks around there.

There was a lot of talent in the fifth, more than any in the last five years. 😆 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
On 4/30/2024 at 9:21 PM, 07579394 said:

LOL,gained a 5th round pick,and lost Colson.

Yeah, much preferred Coulson to Wallace. Wallace is the better coverage guy, but Coulson seems to understand what's going on a lot more. At least at this stage. More upside on Wallace, but Coulson is more likely to be ready to start if someone gets hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

Dan's got quite a job to do washing the stink off from the Fitterer regime. Maybe he will, maybe he won't. I wasn't happy with our choice to keep him, but even I've got to say he seems to have done well, at least on paper, for this point.

But we've felt this way before at this point in the season -- All optimistic.

I'm not completely withdrawing my earlier judgement, but he's beginning to make a case for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Dan's got quite a job to do washing the stink off from the Fitterer regime. Maybe he will, maybe he won't. I wasn't happy with our choice to keep him, but even I've got to say he seems to have done well, at least on paper, for this point.

But we've felt this way before at this point in the season -- All optimistic.

I'm not completely withdrawing my earlier judgement, but he's beginning to make a case for himself.

you are correct, it's too early to judge.

one thing that's interesting to think about is, we have have a pretty good idea of what dan is looking for and that vision is a bit more clear in the draft. it's kind of these ferocious guys that have that fight or that dawg in them. some have a lot of natural talent, but are a bit unrefined and untuned, but they play with a lot of aggression. and we can see that he's trying to get us back to a point where no matter what we did, we were going to be putting up a fight.

i think both he and canales have that in mind, but more morgan in the design and he got canales in to get that fight in them tuned and refined and channeled where it needs to go.

looking back at the past couple regimes...rhule, reich, fitt...especially fitt...what was the plan? what was their vision of the panthers? what did they have in mind? i don't think i know. i don't think they knew. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RumHam Veteran

RumHam

Posted
Posted
On 4/30/2024 at 9:38 PM, MHS831 said:

I realize that the players performance will finalize opinions, but they certainly did not bully Morgan. He got the best of the trades he was involved in---and he seems to have done well in free agency.    This is a two year process if both years are done correctly---I did not want Morgan. 

Changing my mind.

how is it changing your mind? you've seen nothing of the product on the field. WE SAID THE SAME THING LAST YEAR

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RumHam Veteran

RumHam

Posted
Posted

knowing how this team works, johnson will have a TD week one but Theilen will continue to be force fed, Mingo and Legette will have little impact on the offense, and they'll continue to trot out Miles Sanders to run for a yard every down then punt. It's worse than John Fox era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      A pretty insane QB stat

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I think evaluating QBs making the transition to the NFL is just a lot harder and more nuanced than draftniks make it out to be. That and the rookie wage scale means that if you don't have a franchise QB on the roster and you think this guy might be one you're almost forced to draft him now that you're protected from giving that guy a future HOFer type contract before he ever plays an NFL down. The expectation for mist of these guys to play right away is also not helping IMO.
    • Khyber53
      A pretty insane QB stat

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Plenty of good teams made it to Super Bowls and some even won with meh QBs. Takes solid defense, good offensive planning and play calling and a helluva lot of magic. And I think the great QB elevating a team thing is overplayed too much. History just doesn't bear it out. Sure, it can lift a moderately good team like Mahomes did with the Chiefs, or Hurts did with the Eagles. And one can argue about Brady and the Pats (or even Bucs) but if you look at those Patriot and Buccaneer teams... there was something very solid in place already.  Heck, the whole idea that a single player can make or break an NFL team is vastly overplayed. The Cowboys have had a roster full of "star" players for decades now and have gotten bupkus in return. The Raiders have chased everything they could and have floundered mightily. The Giants have had star after star and nothing.  It's just hard to sell posters of a team. Give the marketing people a star though...
    • Navy_football
      A pretty insane QB stat

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Seems you found the "exception" to the OP. Eli wasn't actually drafted by the Giants. But that's the only team he ever played for since he refused to go to San Diego. 
×
×
  • Create New...