Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RUMORS: Panthers schedule leak


Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, t96 said:

Would’ve considered going to Germany if it was the Chiefs as rumored a year ago. Giants I don’t think so

I was all-in on the Chiefs rumor, but chances are that the Panthers said "let's keep Chiefs in Charlotte" due to potential of high ticket sales since KC hasn't been in Carolina for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

adding to the rumor mill:

there's a possibility that Netflix will pick up one (or two) CHRISTMAS DAY games for broadcast this season.

I don't think it'd happen this year -- too many moving parts related to pulling games away from CBS/FOX to make it happen, but it's something to keep an eye on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BrewerHouseBeer said:

I really want to go to that Germany game. We already have a Bavaria trip planned for December though. No way my wife let's me move our trip for this. Hahaha 

where are you going ? Been to berlin and munich before but looking to schedule another trip to germany with my wife in the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SOJA said:

very glad we get chicago early while they are still working out their kinks because by seasons end that team might be dangerous 

Or they might suck just as bad as they have the last few years.  QB's picked at the top of the draft don't always live up to their billing.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

adding to the rumor mill:

there's a possibility that Netflix will pick up one (or two) CHRISTMAS DAY games for broadcast this season.

I don't think it'd happen this year -- too many moving parts related to pulling games away from CBS/FOX to make it happen, but it's something to keep an eye on.

I think I'm the only person in the US that doesn't have Netflix 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SOJA said:

where are you going ? Been to berlin and munich before but looking to schedule another trip to germany with my wife in the future

We went to Cologne, Rothenburg, and Munich this past July. This time we are going to Frankfurt, Rothenburg again, and Freiburg. Maybe a day trip to Munich if there is time. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...