Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the Panthers be better than most are expecting?


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I want to see both lines play.  I pray they both stay healthy. 

If we can win in the trenches,  then there is a chance we win more than a few games. 🤣

That's football. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Only valid answer here.

Even if things look fantastic in camp I'm not buying it until I see it in preseason. Been bamboozled too many times.

And for the folks who may insist preseason is pointless and doesn't mean anything because no one wants to give anything away. We can dig up the threads of folks downplaying our putrid offense last August.

When your lines and wr's/db's are getting beat one on one in basic vanilla play calls it translates to the regular season. Especially when your 1's are getting outplayed by other teams 2's and 3's. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

5-6 games isn't much of an accomplishment. You basically just need a couple lucky bounces and a couple of opponents not showing up. You're still one of the worst teams in the league.

But no, honestly I expect fewer.

Also regardless of win total, we need to see the offense putting up more than an average of 13.9 points per game, and if you take out Daltons 27 point game I don't even wanna calculate how much lower that number would be

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at getting back to normal bad vs last year's terrible. So pick 5 instead of pick 1?

Just take a vacation dude. Or start talking about '25s QB situation. Or that the people in charge blew so much money on OGs and ignored C. But that kind of improvement is just getting back to Rhule ball lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...