Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the Panthers be better than most are expecting?


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I want to see both lines play.  I pray they both stay healthy. 

If we can win in the trenches,  then there is a chance we win more than a few games. 🤣

That's football. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Only valid answer here.

Even if things look fantastic in camp I'm not buying it until I see it in preseason. Been bamboozled too many times.

And for the folks who may insist preseason is pointless and doesn't mean anything because no one wants to give anything away. We can dig up the threads of folks downplaying our putrid offense last August.

When your lines and wr's/db's are getting beat one on one in basic vanilla play calls it translates to the regular season. Especially when your 1's are getting outplayed by other teams 2's and 3's. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

5-6 games isn't much of an accomplishment. You basically just need a couple lucky bounces and a couple of opponents not showing up. You're still one of the worst teams in the league.

But no, honestly I expect fewer.

Also regardless of win total, we need to see the offense putting up more than an average of 13.9 points per game, and if you take out Daltons 27 point game I don't even wanna calculate how much lower that number would be

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at getting back to normal bad vs last year's terrible. So pick 5 instead of pick 1?

Just take a vacation dude. Or start talking about '25s QB situation. Or that the people in charge blew so much money on OGs and ignored C. But that kind of improvement is just getting back to Rhule ball lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...