Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ARTICLE Adam Thielen: “You can tell by his demeanor that Bryce Young is more comfortable“


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

yeah I would definitely take our board know it all fat guys intel over Thielen's any day of the week since Thielen said he had confidence in Bryce last season as obviously our board know it all fat guys have never gotten anything wrong in their lives other than thinking their summer swim suit actually looked good stretched across their hairy bellies like a dozen soggy jelly donuts stuffed in a used condom

Translation please

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KSpan said:

Yes, and I'm 100% serious here, as far as I'm concerned they would be better off saying absolutely nothing from now until week 1.

If it was up to the players and coaches they prob wouldn’t say much of anything… but there’s billions of dollars in media contracts with obligations to fill.  Articles like this one aren’t written cause Adam called a reporter with something to say.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This place is hilarious.  Huddle, Keep on Huddling!

I'm looking forward to seeing what the team does this season.  Am I expecting one extreme or another?  No.  Somewhere in the low middle of expectations.  

You just have to look at the business of the NFL and media.  There's a reason there's a ton of pressers during OTAs and mini camp because it sells clicks.  Just don't read it if it sets you off.

So whatever.  Let's see how things go.  My hope is that the Panthers are better, Bryce is better, our new additions make plays, and we can be hopeful for the future.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe talk more about Brown or the usual long shot to make the roster fluff? After last year's massive PR bungles focusing on Young as little as possible would be a mercy to everyone. I get there isn't a lot to positive to focus on until they start winning games, or not, but that's kind of the point of the people who see that department as a endless crap pump. Making fun of what they usually put out is way too easy and it's about the only entertainment they are providing anymore until something actually changes. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Maybe talk more about Brown or the usual long shot to make the roster fluff? After last year's massive PR bungles focusing on Young as little as possible would be a mercy to everyone. I get there isn't a lot to positive to focus on until they start winning games, or not, but that's kind of the point of the people who see that department as a endless crap pump. Making fun of what they usually put out is way too easy and it's about the only entertainment they are providing anymore until something actually changes. 

yeah I agree sure talk & talk optimistically howeverr find a better topic to talk about...just saying

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

Maybe talk more about Brown or the usual long shot to make the roster fluff? After last year's massive PR bungles focusing on Young as little as possible would be a mercy to everyone. I get there isn't a lot to positive to focus on until they start winning games, or not, but that's kind of the point of the people who see that department as a endless crap pump. Making fun of what they usually put out is way too easy and it's about the only entertainment they are providing anymore until something actually changes. 

 

1 hour ago, bandu said:

yeah I agree sure talk & talk optimistically howeverr find a better topic to talk about...just saying

Rich Eisen: “How is Bryce Young looking right now after his season, Adam?”

You wanted him to deflect and talk about Derrick Brown or roster long-shots? What? Clearly you didn’t click the link in the OP or watch the interview if you think “they” (the Panthers) put this out. It’s an NBCSports article that references an interview Thielen did recently on the Rich Eisen show where he was asked a direct question about Bryce Young. So who exactly is running PR for the Panthers here? NBCSports? Or Rich Eisen?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

 

Rich Eisen: “How is Bryce Young looking right now after his season, Adam?”

You wanted him to deflect and talk about Derrick Brown or roster long-shots? What? Clearly you didn’t click the link in the OP or watch the interview if you think “they” (the Panthers) put this out. It’s an NBCSports article that references an interview Thielen did recently on the Rich Eisen show where he was asked a direct question about Bryce Young. So who exactly is running PR for the Panthers here? NBCSports? Or Rich Eisen?

Did you not read the post before mine? Cynicism being well earned. 

No I didn't listen to it or any of the other fluff. I also wasn't speaking about this specific link since I never referenced Thielen or the article in my post. The fact a WR from this team went and sat down, I presume, for an interview is Panther related and looks to be getting plenty of spillover from what I was talking about. So much so that on the first page it was being discussed about everyone 'should say absolutely nothing' which would encompass Thielen's interview individually and the Panther's organization in general. And even how absurd it is to 'shut down the Panther's PR/Marketing department' on page two even though as you state it was obviously not a direct PR department product. 

So maybe take your own advice next time? IDGAF about the article and wasn't commenting on it which I thought was obvious by not referencing it in any direct way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of it, not this particular thing, but the predominant fluff is spammed to this board by the team. 

Most people are not fans of the team PR because the team is never any fuging good after listening to all their unrealistic optimistic bullshit the entire offseason. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...