Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preseason game 2 - who impressed who needs to get their ass cut


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

It's so funny how most of the people claiming they didn't watch it or only watched a small part are commenting the most about how they feel about the game.   I thought it was fairly positive.  Much better than the first game.  No big offensive explosion but what do you expect with Plummer who looked bad in college and some oline players who signed to the team in the past couple days.

I expect that an NFL front office could do better than Plummer at QB 3. Especially when the other two options are a bust and a washed up vet that seems to have zero interest in playing. Do we actively look for the worst players? Seems that way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Boone and Dillon Johnson both deserve spots on the PS.

Jalen Coker has not done enough to make the 53. I think that the team is looking at possibly only carrying 6 WRs and that David Moore has shown more than ISM in preseason.

Plummer makes the PS unless they find a guy on waivers that they've been interested in. I think that they trust his understanding of the offense even though his execution isn't there.

ILB and DB are a lot deeper than we originally anticipated. I think that those groups are going to be tough to trim down.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry for Jack Plumber, he seems like a great fit for the UFL.  He'd do well there frankly.  Adrian Martinez was the best QB in the UFL this spring and he looked rather pedestrian.

I like our young secondary guys.  They played hard.  

I like Dillon Johnson.  Looks to be an interesting developmental player.

DJ Johnson looks like he could be a decent player.  Not good, but a replacement level rotational player.  He doesn't look as hopeless as last year.

Trevin Wallace looks good.  I like what I see there.

TJ Smith could be a really interesting player.

I'm pretty terrified of our OL once and injury or two occurs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2024 at 11:59 PM, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Trevin Wallace is in a position to be in the fold and have a good amount of PT when the season starts.  Not predicting super stardom but he passes the eye test thus far.  

He's had 2 good preseason games and not a lot ahead of him on the depth chart. He and Sanders are looking like quality picks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, I get it. I called him Peewee for the first couple of years. He is too small to be an NFL QB. It wasn't as much of a problem in college, even in the SEC, because every player in the NFL is the size and speed of the biggest 22 on your entire college team.  I was left scratching my head over the pick and what we traded to get him (and yes, that cost analysis is unavoidable). Now we're sunk into the third season and the kid just popped a frikkin' amazing game out there where he showed every mark of what you need in a top end QB. Great passing, mobility, guts, toughness (that ankle must have been killing him) and the ability to put a team on his back to claw back a win. He didn't win it with his arm so much as by getting the ball to the right people at the right time, but that is what the best do. Do I believe he's going to be our QB of the future here? I'm still out on that. Way out on that. But I'm at least intrigued. Can he replicate what he did or even get close? Can he perform well against the power opponents we have left on the schedule? Heck, can he even beat New Orleans this season?  Right now, my personal feeling is that he'd make a heck of a back-up QB. He could prove me wrong and excel, though. Maddening as it is, that'd be the best outcome ever. Or he could have just hit his peak. And that would be bittersweet because then we start the whole thing over again. I don't see a reclaimation project QB out there right now that Canales can work his magic on.
    • The Niners didn't want him. I think to some extent they were publicly shamed into making an offer when it was revealed he was not in their plans.
    • I think that is a price and attitude thing. Reportedly he was a bit of a handful for Shanahan, although admittedly not enough to not sign him to that big deal. I also think this may be much ado about nothing. If we plays this season, I suspect they will likely not move on from him.
×
×
  • Create New...