Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mina Kimes asks Saints' DE Cam Jordan about Bryce Young's rookie season


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’m giving the entire team a do over based on the coaching train wreck last year. We’ll know in the first couple of games where this team stands and whether or not the rebuild is going in the right direction. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saying all the right things with the season opener a few weeks away. Although the remark about being used to having Alabama's offensive line cuts both ways. Many young quarterbacks could thrive under those conditions. Unfortunately the Green Bay method of patience and slow methodical development is rare in today's league and not a one size fits all. Mac Jones can attest to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, frankw said:

Saying all the right things with the season opener a few weeks away. Although the remark about being used to having Alabama's offensive line cuts both ways. Many young quarterbacks could thrive under those conditions. Unfortunately the Green Bay method of patience and slow methodical development is rare in today's league and not a one size fits all. Mac Jones can attest to this.


You have to have someone the rookie can develop under.

Bryce wasn’t going to learn anything behind Baker/Sam.

Learning under Rogers…yeah

Learning under Farve…yeah.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tbe said:


You have to have someone the rookie can develop under.

Bryce wasn’t going to learn anything behind Baker/Sam.

Learning under Rogers…yeah

Learning under Farve…yeah.

 

Favre and Rodgers weren't helping the guys under them.  Neither was a Tom Brady type.  In fact, those dudes are actually trying to derail those behind them. 

I think it's largely just time.  Game speed.  Reps.  Reps. and more reps with NFL caliber players at both sides of the ball. 

I think that's why you used to see a Kurt Waner or Jake Delhomme do so well.  Tons of reps with NFL caliber players before they got their NFL shot. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tbe said:


You have to have someone the rookie can develop under.

Bryce wasn’t going to learn anything behind Baker/Sam.

Learning under Rogers…yeah

Learning under Farve…yeah.

I don't think Favre did much if anything to help develop Rodgers.

The Packers coaching staff is largely response for Jordan Love's development. That is what is most beneficial to any young QB.

When Love was a rookie Rodgers was still playing at a high level. That pushed Love to expand his own game and work on himself. We don't have that here. Andy Dalton serves no purpose. We actually probably have the worst QB depth in the league by design apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CRA said:

Favre and Rodgers weren't helping the guys under them.  Neither was a Tom Brady type.  In fact, those dudes are actually trying to derail those behind them. 

I think it's largely just time.  Game speed.  Reps.  Reps. and more reps with NFL caliber players at both sides of the ball. 

I think that's why you used to see a Kurt Waner or Jake Delhomme do so well.  Tons of reps with NFL caliber players before they got their NFL shot. 


It’s not about a guy actively helping.

It’s about watching the MVP prepare, lead, practice, etc.

Its about seeing a high level of play every day knowing you need to meet that same level.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Well we could have had Fields behind Cam. With CMC. With DJ. 

Are you talking about broken Cam or alternate universe healthy Cam?

Because the latter means we never are in position to take Fields in the first place, nor would need to.

Secondly, IF Fields could be developed(I am not convinced of that) would we be able to develop him? I rather doubt it. No one here developed Cam effectively. Cam was Cam from day one and he learned on the job. The improvements(which he needed) didn't come until far later in his career and seemed to be self initiated rather than franchise initiated. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Tbe said:


It’s not about a guy actively helping.

It’s about watching the MVP prepare, lead, practice, etc.

Its about seeing a high level of play every day knowing you need to meet that same level.

 

Well yeah and it is akin to what was just said about Cam and Fields... 

If you have an MVP you aren’t picking way up there. Someone has to fall.

I think that is the best route though. Take the replacement and do not put them out there. 

You might get a guy you don’t mind giving a second contract to out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, strato said:

Well yeah and it is akin to what was just said about Cam and Fields... 

If you have an MVP you aren’t picking way up there. Someone has to fall.

I think that is the best route though. Take the replacement and do not put them out there. 

You might get a guy you don’t mind giving a second contract to out of it. 

Hindsight is 20/20 though. It's a tough thing to balance when you do have an MVP level QB to use a valuable first round pick on a replacement for that QB instead of maximizing the franchise's window to win. Plenty of Packers fans shat on their FO for "wasting" a pick on Love instead of taking a playmaker for Rodgers to maximize his MVP seasons and get another SB ring. And there's no guarantee the next guy you pick is going to be any good either. The Packers scouted well, but as recently as before the past season plenty of folks were skeptical Love was going to be any good. If you miss on a guy like that, then all you did was piss off your MVP QB, not maximize the chance to win a SB with that QB, and end up getting nothing out of the pick too. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Hindsight is 20/20 though. It's a tough thing to balance when you do have an MVP level QB to use a valuable first round pick on a replacement for that QB instead of maximizing the franchise's window to win. Plenty of Packers fans shat on their FO for "wasting" a pick on Love instead of taking a playmaker for Rodgers to maximize his MVP seasons and get another SB ring. And there's no guarantee the next guy you pick is going to be any good either. The Packers scouted well, but as recently as before the past season plenty of folks were skeptical Love was going to be any good. If you miss on a guy like that, then all you did was piss off your MVP QB, not maximize the chance to win a SB with that QB, and end up getting nothing out of the pick too. 

I know people want instant help, but they have had incredible QB stability there for longer than some people here have been alive. Kind of says something for the way they do it.

And after watching recently, I far prefer: a late round pick, no pressure right away to play him. If he doesn’t look good and you never play him, lile oops bad pick, it hurts but does not destroy and you have a chance to make it up. 

If these guys are good starters eventually you may be taking a late 1st QB averaging every 5 years with a hit and a miss. IOW, you are not doing it every year.

You need a good QB you can count on for a few years to make it work. So there’s that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, it wasn't on him last game. There are many other reasons that come before Bryce. Dave Canales is really starting to worry me. I mean there are glaring issues that can't be excused. I said back when the whole Rico/Chubba thing happened. I said right then that you cannot have a coach that handled those 4 or 5 games the way he did. I get it, most thought that he was trying to throw games, which was not wrong thinking because of how bad it was. The decisions right before half. The strict "Chubba gets this drive and Rico gets the next." It's seeming like a lot of our backups are the better talent, so he cant evaluate talent. Not calling a quarterback sneak because of size. Small quarterback have a different type of advantage, just not as good as a large quarterback, but still doable. Then he doesn't even explain why he didn't put Dalton in there (saying it would give away a quarterback sneak is...just stop). I honestly think he forgot about putting in Dalton. There are so many others that I'd have to re-watch the games to remember.  I could make a whole other post on that defensive game plan...absolutely awful. And a quick petition...see the quote above, can we please ban these weirdos and try to clean this place up. This is peak reddit right here and these losers will destroy the board. I couldn't make it though 3 pages because these morons post more than anyone else. These are the perpetual online freaking weirdos banned from getting too close to schools reddit mod types. Get these losers out of here. You got these freaks posting a ton and not answering the question OP posted ABOUT THE PANTHERS. This is supposed to be about football and this dork constantly tries to attack OP's question. Could you imagine someone in your real life group acting like this? You'd kick his butt out immediately. And you have this reddit loser trying to stop people for posting about the Panthers. Any normal person would just skip the post, but you have to remember these morons base their whole personality on their online persona. They would be banned almost everywhere else. Send him back to reddit, they will be a cancer to this place, trust me. I guarantee you he has more comments than 95% of accounts. These guys are the lowest in society so they live online. Its everything to them. You dont want that. Just read his responses. Do background check on that guy, there are younger people on this too and he probably isn't allowed to be talking to them, or be on here at all.
    • Neither of them are getting in. Cam had HOF potential but was squandered by Ron, Shula, and Gettlemen.
    • We have attempted several over the past two seasons. Maybe two successful?
×
×
  • Create New...