Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Farewell Ian Thomas????


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NAS said:

He's not going anywhere, we can keep 4 TE's, especially in this offense. 

100%. I think we are going to run a lot of 2 TE sets, and I think it's almost a forgone conclusion we keep 4 TEs.

I think Thomas, Tremble, Sanders, and Matthews will all make the team.

I also think there is a chance we only keep 5 WRs (especially if we can find a trade partner for TMJ) given the practice squad elevation rules (elevate a guy up to 3 times during the season before you have to add them to the active roster).

I ultimately think we keep 6 WRs, but I am 99.9999% sure we're keeping 4 TEs, and Ian Thomas will be one of those 4, at least for this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thomas isn't going anywhere...unfortunately.

image.png.2d45ec345da6321c32e48c0b9d806e73.png

A healthy TE, with starting experience--even as pedestrian as Ian has been isn't getting cut.  Our TE room is still marginal and kicking him to the curb being on the hook for nearly $4M with no cap relief is just silly.   Let him walk next year and he can get us his 300-400 yards and a TD this season (career average).

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is hurt I wouldn't be surprised to see him begin the year on IR.  There is no relief to cutting him vs keeping him.  If there team needs a 4th TE look at Hollister as the option to be kept.  He is only getting the vet minimum, which may not necessarily count against the cap.  Additionally, he know Canalas's system in and out from being on Seattle for years.

The new IR rules allow teams to keep players like Thomas since IR is no longer all year or nothing.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's only making 1.3 million this season and is a UFA after this year.

Seems like an obvious move to turn the page. No ill will toward him though. In his defense he has been here through three coaching staffs. And multiple front offices. But we've paid him almost 15 million dollars to basically do nothing. He'll be fine.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

He's only making 1.3 million this season and is a UFA after this year.

Seems like an obvious move to turn the page. No ill will toward him though. In his defense he has been here through three coaching staffs. And multiple front offices. But we've paid him almost 15 million dollars to basically do nothing. He'll be fine.

Cap hit is $3.8 mil. 

That doesn't change if we cut him, unfortunately.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Cap hit is $3.8 mil. 

That doesn't change if we cut him, unfortunately.

I see. That's a somewhat significant hit. Well if it boils down to one roster spot between the TE/WR/RB units being a tough call and keeping him might mean losing one of them I think you have to just go ahead and rip the bandaid off. Just my .2 cents though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

I see. That's a somewhat significant hit. Well if it boils down to one roster spot between the TE/WR/RB units being a tough call and keeping him might mean losing one of them I think you have to just go ahead and rip the bandaid off. Just my .2 cents though.

I am okay cutting him but I suspect he gets one more year. Hell, we will probably extend him and make him a top 10 paid TE during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Canales paired w/ Bryce has been figured out.   I think Canales is pretty simplistic.  Which he told us when we hired him.   You need a QB like Baker he is flat out going to make big throws downfield.  Or a Jake.  He isn't some modern day scheme dude.  Run run set up the downfield stuff.  It's not going to be the scheme but players that win.  I mean, it's not literally every possession but that was every passing O Canales has ever been around and it's the core of what his O is structured to be.  Bryce doesn't fit that.  Bryce needs a modern day playcaller and scheme w/ the weapons to go with it.  Dave issue is the same as the Frank issue ultimately.  We got a front office that is building something that actually syncs up.  Failure by design.  If you wanted Bryce, you don't hire Frank.  Or Dave.  And you don't draft XL.  You draft Ladd.  Carolina makes simple hard.   Which you see that a lot in life. 
    • I felt like this season was over back in 2023. Game 1. I hate that I am being serious.     
    • Well if we're going to dumpster dive at least we're looking on the roster of a contender.
×
×
  • Create New...