Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Waiver Claims

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

I don’t really care about these bottom roster spots other than hoping we at some point have decent backups, but Moore over ISM for special teams? Did we watch the game tape? Moore turned in a return to the 14 yard line because he was going backwards when he caught the ball and ISM had a great catch and run to the 50. The stark difference in the return capabilities made me post in another thread that I hope we don’t keep Moore over ISM for returns. 

I hate this team never takes returning seriously. They may for like a year or 2, but then suddenly are like: Nah, fug it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

I don’t really care about these bottom roster spots other than hoping we at some point have decent backups, but Moore over ISM for special teams? Did we watch the game tape? Moore turned in a return to the 14 yard line because he was going backwards when he caught the ball and ISM had a great catch and run to the 50. The stark difference in the return capabilities made me post in another thread that I hope we don’t keep Moore over ISM for returns. 

You forgot one thing, ISM never played for the Seahawks.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Byrdman4real Mentor

Byrdman4real

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah so why keep Ian Thomas and David Moore who are proven jags over higher upside guys that need "development"

Hate to say it, but this staff has favorites. Moore over ISM doesn't make sense. The return game is very important. Field position can determine a game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah so why keep Ian Thomas and David Moore who are proven jags over higher upside guys that need "development"

My guess Moore was kept for his receiving abilities and as for Ian I really don't know. I would say a lot of it had to do with who had a better grasp of the offense at this point,  maybe? I would not worry too much about it as those two are only here as placeholders until the have a better option. It appears they plan to feature the TE a lot so it would explain only carrying 5 wr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Outside of the enigma that is Ian Thomas, David Moore being here as a vet who has come and gone before is the only other spot that seems a bit uninspiring. But realistically, our WR5 isn’t getting substantial production anyways.

This ISM Moore thing is based on ISM was dinged up probably, plus they cut the WRs short so whatever returner that is the better WR is kept. 

This is pretty fluid still I think. 

After week one, the expensive vets' contracts do not need to be guaranteed. 

 

edit: And as for KR, who the hell knows how that is going go? Less certainty may affect investment motivation. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NAS
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By NAS · Posted

      I find it funny those who continue to hate on Bryce based on his rookie year when he had zero weapons or offensive line have a problem with those of us projecting his career from the 8-9 games where he played like a top 10 QB and made more big time throws during that period than any other QB.  The stats may bot have been there in terms of yards or TD passes but that’s coming as the roster improves. For those who think physical traits can overcome roster deficiencies we all witnessed how Mahomes looked under pressure that Bryce faced for most of his rookie year, we saw what happened with Stroud in similar circumstances.  None of us were creating posts proclaiming Bryce as the next Brady but we can’t just sit idly while thread after thread is created continuing with the  anti Bryce tropes  instead of supporting him and just letting him continue to develop.     
    • 45catfan
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By 45catfan · Posted

      To me Bryce's ceiling is his backup, Andy Dalton, in his prime.  Sure, he may get us some winning seasons and may even get us to the playoffs on occasion, but with an early exit.  To me he doesn't have what it takes to be elite and it takes an elite QB to consistently get deep into the playoffs.  He's not Jackson, he's not Mahomes and he's not even Allen.  In an organization like Philly, he possibly could have what it takes to make a deep run, but let's face it...Philly is well oiled machine and and we are a GMC Grimlin.
    • PantherChris
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By PantherChris · Posted

      If he was he would still be in the league.... Cam never learned to play QB without relying on his athletism and rocket arm.   
×
×
  • Create New...